The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB DCA18CA283 · Final report

Airbus A321-271N accident near Los Angeles, California, August 13, 2018

On August 13, 2018 at about 11:45 am local time, a Airbus A321-271N, registered N204HA, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing (flare/touchdown) near Los Angeles, California (Los Angeles International airport). It was flown under scheduled airline rules (Part 121). No one was hurt; 197 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

a tailstrike caused by inappropriate recovery technique after a bounced landing. Contributing to the accident was the failure of the radio altimeter, caused by the approach being over calm/flat water, that was not recognized by the flight crew.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
August 13, 2018 · about 11:45 am local time
Place
Los Angeles, California · Los Angeles International · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 197 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Airbus A321-271N No Series · all A321-271Ns on the register
Registration
N204HA · registry record · serial 7959
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Flight · scheduled airline rules (Part 121)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

On August 13, 2018, about 1645 pacific daylight time, Hawaiian Airlines flight 56, an Airbus A321, N204HA, experienced a tail strike during landing at Los Angeles International Airport (KLAX), Los Angeles, California. There were no injuries to the 197 passengers and crew onboard. The airplane sustained substantial damage. The domestic passenger flight was operating under 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 121 from Kahului Airport (PHOG), Kahului, Hawaii, to KLAX. The first officer (FO) was the pilot flying and the captain was the pilot monitoring. According to the flight crew, they received a GPWS Fail message on the electronic centralized alert monitoring (ECAM) at about 1,500 feet altitude above the ground (agl) after the airplane was established on the ILS 6R approach. The flight crew conducted the appropriate ECAM actions, which only required them to turn off the ground proximity warning system (GPWS) and continued the approach. As the airplane descended through about 50 feet agl, the FO realized the electronic automatic altitude callouts were not being provided by the airplane system but did not have time to react. The airplane touched down firmly, bounced, and the pitch attitude increased before it was arrested by the FO, resulting in the tail section contacting the runway. Post flight examination of the airplane found damage to the aft lower skin, as well as several deformed stringers, tie clips, and frames. During the approach, the crew did not receive any automated altitude callouts that are determined by the radio altimeter (RA). The crew only received the “100 above” and “minimums” callouts, both of which are based on barometric altitude. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed with light winds at the time of the approach resulting in the airplane descending over calm water. In February 2018 (updated on August 6, 2018) the manufacturer released a Flight Operations Transmission (FOT) and an Operations Engineering Bulletin in July 2018 referencing “No RA Available During Approach Over Water”. The FOT indicated that a new RA had abnormal behavior if the airplane approach is over a flat-water area and may not be available. Subsequent to the accident, the operator issued a Memorandum to Pilots that described the circumstances of the accident and the FOT and issued an Operations Engineering Bulletin, which detailed the required procedures if no RA is available.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Abnormal runway contact during landing (flare/touchdown) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Delayed action › Flight crew
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Landing flare › Not attained/maintained
  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Indicating/recording systems › Central warning › Failure

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 3,562 hours in all; 169 in this make and model; 126 in the last 90 days; 60 in the last 30 days; 1,058 as pilot in command; 277 on instruments
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

Co-pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 12,700 hours in all; 200 in this make and model; 7,700 as pilot in command
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Maximum gross weight: 207,014 lb
  • Seats: 200
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: Pratt & Whitney PW1133GA-JM (turbofan); 3,346 hours total
  • Engine 2: Pratt & Whitney PW1133GA-JM (turbofan); 1,878 hours total
  • Operator: Hawaiian Airlines Inc

The flight

  • Departed from: PHOG Maui HI at 6:48 am
  • Destination: KLAX Los Angeles CA
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • Runway 06R, 10,885 ft by 150 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: night, dark
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: scat
  • Temperature: 70°F (21°C), dew point 64°F (18°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.98 inHg

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Cabi5
Flight crew2
Passengers190

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

2 documents, released by the NTSB on July 13, 2021. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.