The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB DCA04MA049 · Final report

Raytheon Corporate Jets 390 Premier I accident near North Las Vegas, Nevada, May 27, 2004

On May 27, 2004 at about 10:57 pm local time, a Raytheon Corporate Jets 390 Premier I, registered N5010X, was substantially damaged in an accident near North Las Vegas, Nevada (North Las Vegas Air Terminal airport). It was a positioning flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The flight's unstabilized approach and excessive speed. Contributing to the excessive touchdown speed was the presence of a tailwind at landing.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
May 27, 2004 · about 10:57 pm local time
Place
North Las Vegas, Nevada · North Las Vegas Air Terminal · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Raytheon Corporate Jets 390 Premier I
Registration
N5010X · no longer on the register · serial RB-10
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Positioning flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The airplane overran the runway after landing on runway 7. The passenger stated that he felt that the approach was "fast" and that the pilot was "behind the power curve" because of high minimum en route altitudes in the area and that they had to "hustle down" during the descent. The passenger indicated that the flight crossed the runway threshold "maybe a bit more" that 10 knots above Vref and touched down about 10 knots above Vref. He said it was not a stabilized approach. Landing distance calculations and other evidence suggest that the lift dump panels did not extend after landing; however, the investigation did not determine the reason(s) for the lack of lift dump. No evidence was found of any failures affecting the lift dump or braking systems. Evidence and interview statements reveal that the pilot flew an unstabilized approach to the runway and landed well above target speed. The high landing speed was result of the pilot's excessive airspeed on the approach and a tailwind component of about 8 knots. Although the pilot landed the airplane within the touchdown area, the airplane's speed upon touchdown was about 17 knots above the prescribed speed. The flight's unstabilized approach and excessive speed should have prompted the pilot to initiate a missed approach.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot
  • Ratings: instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 9,200 hours in all; 40 in this make and model
  • Medical certificate: Class 1
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Williams Rolls FJ44-2A (turbofan); 0 hours total
  • Operator: 390 LLC

The flight

  • Departed from: PSP Palm Springs CA at 10:10 pm
  • Destination: North Las Vegas NV
  • Runway 07, 5,004 ft by 75 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: at 15 knots, gusting 20
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: vv; clear
  • Temperature: 95°F (35°C), dew point 46°F (8°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.80 inHg

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.