The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CHI94LA069 · Final report

Amateur-built SUPERCAT accident near Stafford, Kansas, January 23, 1994

On January 23, 1994 at about 9:45 pm local time, a amateur-built SUPERCAT, registered UNREG, was substantially damaged in an accident near Stafford, Kansas. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was seriously injured. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

THE PILOT'S FAILURE TO REFUEL THE AIRPLANE PRIOR TO FUEL EXHAUSTION, AND HIS FAILURE TO MAINTAIN AIRSPEED RESULTING IN AN AERODYNAMIC STALL. HIS INADEQUATE TRAINING WAS A FACTOR IN THE ACCIDENT.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
January 23, 1994 · about 9:45 pm local time
Place
Stafford, Kansas · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was seriously injured.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Amateur-built SUPERCAT
Registration
UNREG · no longer on the register
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

THE PILOT WAS NOT QUALIFIED TO FLY THE AMATEUR BUILT AIRPLANE. HE WAS NOT CERTIFICATED AS REQUIRED BY THE FAA, AND NO RECORD OF FORMAL TRAINING WAS CLAIMED. THE PILOT STATED THAT WHILE CRUISING ABOUT 2000 FEET AGL, THE AIRPLANE LOST ALL ENGINE POWER. WHILE HE WAS TURNING TO CHANGE DIRECTION, THE AIRPLANE STALLED. THE PILOT WAS ABLE TO REGAIN CONTROL AT APPROXIMATELY 100 TO 200 FEET AGL BEFORE IMPACTING THE GROUND. POSTACCIDENT EXAMINATION REVEALED NO FUEL IN THE FUEL TANK.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

Pilot

  • Medical certificate: None
  • Seat: ctr

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: inspection type not recorded
  • Seats: 1
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Zenoah G50 (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 0

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 150° at 7 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 59°F (15°C), dew point 25°F (-4°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.00 inHg
  • Observation at 9:55 pm from GBD, 25 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Other NTSB records under UNREG the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

2026-07-07CEN26LA246 · accident near Hooker, OK · substantial damage · minor injuries
2026-02-28CEN26LA131 · accident near Van Burensburg, IL · substantial damage · no injuries
2025-10-13ERA26LA017 · accident near Gaffney, SC · substantial damage · serious injuries
2025-09-27CEN25LA397 · accident near Harvard, IL · substantial damage · no injuries
2025-09-12CEN25LA385 · accident near Rossville, IN · substantial damage · serious injuries
2025-07-07CEN25LA242 · incident near Ingram, TX · minor damage · no injuries
2025-06-18DCA25WA305 · accident near N/A · serious injuries
2025-05-01OPS25LA034 · incident near Washington, DC
2025-04-11CEN25LA155 · accident near Brady, TX · substantial damage · serious injuries
2025-01-30DCA25MA108 · accident near Washington, DC · destroyed · fatal

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.