The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CHI01LA074 · Final report

Cessna 150H accident near Burlington, Wisconsin, January 28, 2001

On January 28, 2001 at about 10:00 pm local time, a Cessna 150H, registered N22026, was substantially damaged in an accident near Burlington, Wisconsin (Burlington Municipal Airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

Aircraft control not maintained by the pilot during the landing roll. Factors to the accident were the loss of engine power for undetermined reasons, the end of the runway being snow-covered, and the snowbank.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
January 28, 2001 · about 10:00 pm local time
Place
Burlington, Wisconsin · Burlington Municipal Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 150H · all 150Hs on the register
Registration
N22026 · no longer on the register · serial 15068017
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

On initial climb the engine lost power and the pilot landed the airplane near the departure-end of the runway. During landing rollout the airplane slid into a frozen snowbank along the left side of the runway. The pilot stated, "Immediately after rotation, only 7-8' off the ground, engine lost power and made a noise. Aborted takeoff and landed at far end of runway. Upon touch down, plane skidded left and I corrected to the right but continued to skid - slick - corrected to the left again and skidded into snowbank. The pilot reported, "Snow bank was frozen and quite hard, struck snowbank and subsequently nosed over." Postaccident investigation of the engine did not reveal any anomalies that would preclude the normal operation of the engine.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

Pilot

  • Certificate: student
  • Flight time: 40 hours in all; 6 in this make and model; 12 in the last 90 days; 4 in the last 30 days
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (valid medical--w/ waivers/lim.)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 4,568.1 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, October 6, 2000; 67 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,600 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Continental O-200-A (piston); 0 hours total
  • Operator: Service Aviation, Inc.

The flight

  • Departed from: C52 Burlington WI at 10:00 pm
  • Destination: C52 Burlington WI
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 29, 4,300 ft by 75 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 230° at 7 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 25°F (-4°C), dew point 18°F (-8°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.21 inHg
  • Observation at 9:53 pm from ENW, 18 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.