The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN23LA067 · Final report

Cessna 172F accident near Auburn Hills, Michigan, December 21, 2022

On December 21, 2022 at about 2:47 pm local time, a 1965 Cessna 172F, registered N8768U, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute near Auburn Hills, Michigan. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The catastrophic engine failure due to lack of oil lubrication, which resulted from the pilot’s failure to follow the airplane and engine manufacturers’ guidance for cold weather operation.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
December 21, 2022 · about 2:47 pm local time
Place
Auburn Hills, Michigan · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person had minor injuries.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 172F, built 1965 · all 172Fs on the register
Registration
N8768U · registry record · serial 17252691
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported that shortly after takeoff, as the airplane was climbing through about 3,000 feet, the engine “coughed and shuddered and started to run rough.” After unsuccessfully troubleshooting the engine, the pilot decided to conduct an emergency landing on a nearby road. During the landing the airplane’s left wing clipped trees, causing the airplane to veer left and flip over. The airplane sustained substantial damage that included damage to both wings, horizontal and vertical stabilizers, fuselage, and engine mounts. Postaccident examination revealed a trail of oil from the airplane’s hangar, down the taxiway, leading to the departure runway. The underside of the airplane was covered in engine oil, and the externally mounted engine oil cooler exhibited fresh oil leakage. The No. 4 cylinder connecting rod was separated and there were holes through the engine crankcase above the No. 4 cylinder, consistent with catastrophic failure due to a lack of lubrication. The outside air temperature at the time of the accident was about 28oF. According to the airplane manufacturer, engine oil with a viscosity of SAE 20 was to be used at temperatures below 40oF and SAE 40 was to be used for temperatures above 40oF. However, the oil in the airplane’s engine had a viscosity of SAE 50, with an operating temperature range of 60o to 80o F. Although the pilot added an oil additive to “thin the engine oil,” the aircraft manufacturer noted that the use of any oil additives during cold weather operation is not recommended. Additionally, the engine manufacturer indicated that operation of the engine without preheat could lead to oil congealing and engine failure, and operation of the engine above 1,700 rpm without first reaching minimum oil temperature could also lead to engine failure. The pilot reported that during the engine runup and takeoff roll the engine oil temperature gauge indication was “not registering,” and he did not remember whether the oil pressure gauge indication was in the normal operating range. It is likely that the pilot’s failure to preheat the engine before starting it, in combination with his failure to warm the engine to operating temperature before takeoff, resulted in the engine failure.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of engine power (total) during enroute defining event
  2. Aircraft servicing event during prior to flight
  3. Powerplant sys/comp malf/fail during enroute (cruise)
  4. Loss of engine power (total) during emergency descent
  5. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during landing

The NTSB's findings

  • Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Oil › Fluid condition
  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Incorrect action performance › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, flight instructor
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 3,929 hours in all; 421 in this make and model; 29 in the last 90 days; 2 in the last 30 days; 3,317 as pilot in command; 642 on instruments
  • Last flight review: May 31, 2022
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: minor injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 8,776 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, December 1, 2021
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,300 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Continental O-300-D (piston); 4,089 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: VLL Troy MI at 2:30 pm
  • Destination: VLL Troy MI
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 23,000 ft; scat at 17,000 ft
  • Temperature: 28°F (-2°C), dew point 12°F (-11°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.38 inHg
  • Observation at 1:53 pm from PTK, 8 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

7 documents, released by the NTSB on June 22, 2023. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.