Beech A36TC accident near Rockport, Texas, November 15, 2021
On November 15, 2021 at about 1:45 pm local time, a 1981 Beech A36TC, registered N1805D, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach (VFR pattern final) near Rockport, Texas. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The total loss of engine power for reasons that could not be determined based on available evidence.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- November 15, 2021 · about 1:45 pm local time
- Place
- Rockport, Texas · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 1 person had minor injuries.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Beech A36TC, built 1981 · all A36TCs on the register
- Registration
- N1805D · registry record · serial EA-233
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The private pilot stated that, before departure for the 45-minute flight, the airplane contained 70 total gallons of fuel: 20 gallons in each wing tip tank and about 15 gallons in each main tank. Shortly after departure, the pilot switched the fuel selector from a main tank to the left tip tank. About 20 minutes into the flight, the pilot noticed “a trail of fuel being sucked out of both the left and right main [tank] gas caps.” The pilot decided to continue the flight because, at that time, the airplane was about halfway to the destination airport and the weather was favorable. In preparation for the visual approach, the pilot switched the fuel selector to the left main fuel tank. When the airplane was at an altitude of 1,200 ft and was about 4 miles from the runway, the engine “sputtered a couple of times and quit completely.” The pilot switched to the right main fuel tank, which indicated 1/2 fuel and attempted an engine restart that was unsuccessful. The pilot switched back to the left main fuel tank, which also indicated 1/2 fuel. The pilot recognized that the airplane was not going to make it to the runway, so he ditched the airplane into the water about 1.5 miles short of the runway. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the fuselage, both wings and ailerons. Postaccident examination of the airframe revealed no evidence of mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. The fuel selector was found in the left main fuel tank position. The engine and magnetos could not be functionally tested due to water immersion/damage. The enginedriven fuel pump was removed; residual fuel, consistent with aviation gasoline, drained from the fuel pump, and the drive spline was intact. Application of compressed air to the fuel system revealed the venting of air from the left and right fuel caps; no additional anomalies were noted with the fuel system. Both the left and right fuel caps showed evidence of water corrosion, and the cap O-rings appeared dry and pliable. Although the pilot reported observing fuel draining from the fuel caps, he also reported the airplane fuel tank indicators showed about one-half of the fuel capacity in each main fuel tank when the engine lost power. As a result, the reason for the total loss of engine power could not be determined based on the available evidence for this investigation.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Loss of engine power (total) during approach (VFR pattern final)
- Ditching during emergency descent
- Unknown or undetermined during approach (VFR pattern final) defining event
The NTSB's findings
- Not determined › Not determined › (general) › (general) › Unknown/Not determined
Pilot
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 2,400 hours in all; 300 in this make and model; 14 in the last 90 days; 2 in the last 30 days; 2,400 as pilot in command
- Last flight review: June 18, 2021
- Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: left
- Injury: minor injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 1,700 hours
- Last inspection: annual inspection, May 10, 2021
- Maximum gross weight: 3,849 lb
- Seats: 6
- Landing gear: retractable
- Engine: Continental TSIO-520-UB (piston); 1,570 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: HYI San Marcos TX at 12:45 pm
- Flight plan: none
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Visibility: 7 statute miles
- Sky: clear
- Temperature: 70°F (21°C), dew point 66°F (19°C)
- Altimeter: 30.17 inHg
- Observation at 7:53 am from KRKP, 4 miles away
Weather report (METAR): KRKP 151353Z AUTO 00000KT 7SM CLR 21/19 A3017 RMK AO2 SLP217 T02060194
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
2 documents, released by the NTSB on April 5, 2023. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 | PDF, 9 pages | View Download |
| 2 | NTSB Examination Summary | PDF, 4 pages | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
