The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN19FA140 · Final report

Air Tractor AT502 accident near Eagle Lake, Texas, May 11, 2019

On May 11, 2019 at about 1:10 pm local time, a 1992 Air Tractor AT502, registered N713LA, was destroyed in an accident during enroute near Eagle Lake, Texas. It was an aerial application (crop spraying) flight under agricultural flying rules (Part 137). 1 person was killed. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The non-instrument-rated pilot's decision to fly into instrument meteorological conditions, which resulted in spatial disorientation, a loss of control, and a subsequent impact with terrain.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
May 11, 2019 · about 1:10 pm local time
Place
Eagle Lake, Texas · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was killed.
Weather
instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
Aircraft
Air Tractor AT502 A, built 1992
Registration
N713LA · no longer on the register · serial 502A-0177
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Aerial application (crop spraying) flight · agricultural flying rules (Part 137)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The non-instrument-rated commercial pilot departed from the operator's airstrip and was planning to conduct a visual flight rules (VFR) aerial application flight in an airplane that was not equipped for instrument flight rules (IFR) flight. Shortly after departure in visual meteorological conditions, the pilot contacted the operator and reported that he observed fog that was "rolling in."  The pilot reported that he was flying above the fog layer.  The pilot stated that he was going divert to a local airport, instead of returning to the operator's airstrip, and terminate the flight. No further communication was received from the pilot. Data obtained from two onboard units that contained airplane track data showed that, during the last several minutes of the flight, the airplane entered two spiraling turns. The second spiraling turn included a rapid descent from the airplane's altitude in the direction of the accident site. The airplane wreckage was discovered in a grass field about 7.5 miles southwest from the diversion airport. Two witnesses who were near the accident site heard the accident airplane flying overhead and reported that they did not hear any sounds associated with an airplane problem before the sound of the airplane's impact. An examination of the airframe and engine revealed no mechanical anomalies. The investigation was unable to determine, with the available evidence, whether the pilot had received an official weather briefing or accessed weather information before the flight. Multiple weather sources indicated low ceilings and the presence of fog, which were conducive to low IFR conditions, before and at the time of the accident for the area near the accident site. The witnesses who heard the accident airplane reported a low level of fog about the time of the accident and an area of clear visibility between the ground and fog. Fog differs from clouds in that the base of fog is at the Earth's surface, while clouds are above the Earth's surface. Given the weather data, airplane track data, and witness statements, the airplane likely flew into an area of fog just before the accident for underdetermined reasons. The IMC present at the time was conducive to the development of spatial disorientation, and the airplane's flight track was consistent with the known effects of spatial disorientation.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. VFR encounter with IMC during enroute defining event
  2. Attempted remediation/recovery during enroute
  3. Loss of visual reference during enroute
  4. Loss of control in flight during enroute
  5. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during enroute

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • cause Personnel issues › Psychological › Perception/orientation/illusion › Spatial disorientation › Pilot
  • cause Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Low ceiling › Effect on operation
  • cause Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Below VFR minima › Effect on operation
  • Personnel issues › Experience/knowledge › Experience/qualifications › Total instrument experience › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 3,164 hours in all; 511 in this make and model
  • Last flight review: February 25, 2019
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: sngl
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 9,087.7 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, February 17, 2019
  • Maximum gross weight: 8,000 lb
  • Seats: 1
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6A-45R (turboprop); 28,896 hours total
  • Operator: A N F Air Service, Inc.

The flight

  • Departed from: Garwood TX at 12:43 pm
  • Destination: Garwood TX
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 330° at 8 knots, gusting 14
  • Visibility: 4 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 200 ft
  • Temperature: 64°F (18°C), dew point 63°F (17°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.89 inHg
  • Observation at 1:15 pm from KELA, 6 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

15 documents, released by the NTSB on May 5, 2020. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.