The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN17FA231 · Final report

Gefa-Flug GMBH AS-105-GD accident near Hartford, Wisconsin, June 15, 2017

On June 15, 2017 at about 4:15 pm local time, a Gefa-Flug GMBH AS-105-GD (airship), registered GSUNA, was destroyed in an accident during approach near Hartford, Wisconsin (Erin Aero Airport). It was an other work-use flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was seriously injured. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The overpressurization failure of the airship envelope as a result of the airship's encounter with gusty wind conditions and thermal activity. Contributing to the accident was the jammed Plexiglass venting panel.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
June 15, 2017 · about 4:15 pm local time
Place
Hartford, Wisconsin · Erin Aero Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was seriously injured.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Gefa-Flug GMBH AS-105-GD
Registration
GSUNA · no longer on the register · serial 0010
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Other work-use flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The commercial pilot stated that, before the 2nd aerial advertising flight of the day in the airship, he checked the wind conditions and determined that, although the wind was still within flight parameters, it would be increasing, which would make "flying more challenging." After 15 minutes of flight time, the pilot returned to land because the wind was stronger than forecasted. As the airship approached the runway the pilot released the drop line and attempted to open the Plexiglass panel that is used for venting and descent control. However, the panel jammed closed.  Shortly thereafter, the airship encountered a thermal that caused the airship to rise. The airship leveled around 500 ft above ground level, at which time the pilot heard a "loud air explosion," which violently shook the airship. He looked up at the envelope and noted a panel of fabric located aft of his sitting position and near the top of the envelope was missing. Within seconds he heard up to four more air explosions. The pilot stated that the envelope began to sag, and the forward speed of the airship resulted in the nose of the airship collapsing in and around the burners, which ignited the fabric. The pilot shut off the fuel to the burners, secured his five-point harness, and braced for impact as the airship descended. After impact, the pilot was able to get out of the gondola and crawl a short distance before the ground crew arrived and pulled him away from the wreckage. The maximum wind for takeoff listed in the flight manual as 12 knots; the wind velocity reported 15 miles from the accident site at the time of the accident was 10 knots gusting to 15 knots; 1 hour earlier the wind velocity was 7 knots. The flight manual also stated that the airship must not be operated when thermals are present. Given the increase in wind velocity and the thermal activity, it is likely that a localized area of high pressure developed in the crown of the envelope that exceeded the strength capability of the envelope, resulting an overpressurization and the subsequent explosive failure of the balloon fabric. It is also likely that the jammed Plexiglass panel used for venting prevented the pilot from relieving pressure in the envelope as the airship climbed.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Aircraft structural failure during approach defining event
  2. Fire/smoke (non-impact) during approach
  3. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft structures › Balloon/dirigible structures › (general) › Failure
  • cause Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › High wind › Effect on equipment
  • cause Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Temp/humidity/pressure › Thermal lifting › Effect on equipment
  • factor Aircraft › Aircraft structures › Balloon/dirigible structures › (general) › Malfunction

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane; rotorcraft: balloon
  • Flight time: 634.5 hours in all; 316.7 in this make and model; 607.5 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: May 30, 2016
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: serious injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 325 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, September 22, 2016
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,984 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Rotax 582UL (piston); 17 hours total
  • Operator: Airsign LTD

The flight

  • Departed from: WN75 Hartford WI at 4:00 pm
  • Destination: WN75 Hartford WI
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 270° at 7 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: scat at 5,000 ft
  • Temperature: 77°F (25°C), dew point 66°F (19°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.82 inHg
  • Observation at 3:45 pm from UES, 15 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

14 documents, released by the NTSB on February 20, 2019. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.