The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN16FA269 · Final report

Aeronca 11AC accident near Ishpeming, Michigan, July 19, 2016

On July 19, 2016, a 1946 Aeronca 11AC, registered N85893, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach (VFR pattern base) near Ishpeming, Michigan (Private Airstrip airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's failure to maintain airspeed following a loss of engine power due to carburetor icing while turning from base to final at a low altitude, which resulted in the airplane's wing exceeding its critical angle of attack and a subsequent aerodynamic stall.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
July 19, 2016
Place
Ishpeming, Michigan · Private Airstrip · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people were killed.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Aeronca 11AC, built 1946 · all 11ACs on the register
Registration
N85893 · no longer on the register · serial 11AC-277
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

During a personal local flight, the private pilot made a low pass in the airplane over the runway and turned left to enter the traffic pattern for landing. A witness stated that the airplane "looked mushy" when it made its left crosswind turn. Another witness reported that the airplane appeared to enter a "close-in" traffic pattern at an estimated altitude of 100 to 150 ft above ground level. He further stated that the airplane's airspeed seemed slower than normal. He stopped watching the airplane until he heard a change in its engine noise. When he looked back, the airplane was in a left bank turning from the base leg to final approach, and the engine stopped producing power. The airplane immediately went into a left spiral and turned about 360° before impacting the ground. The accident site was located about 1,200 ft from the approach end of the runway near the runway centerline. A postaccident examination of the airframe and engine did not reveal any evidence of a mechanical malfunction or failure that would have precluded normal operation. Although the airplane's calculated weight at the time of the accident was about 6 pounds over its maximum gross weight, this likely was not a factor in the accident as it would not have significantly increased the airplane's stall speed. A carburetor icing probability chart indicated a probability of serious icing at glide power at the temperature and dew point reported at the time of the accident. Given that no mechanical reason for the loss of engine power was identified, it is likely that the loss of engine power was due to carburetor icing. Following the loss of engine power, the pilot likely failed to maintain adequate airspeed, resulting in the airplane's wing exceeding its critical angle-of-attack and a subsequent aerodynamic stall.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of engine power (total) during approach (VFR pattern base)
  2. Loss of control in flight during approach (VFR pattern base)
  3. Aerodynamic stall/spin during approach (VFR pattern base) defining event
  4. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Airspeed › Not attained/maintained
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Angle of attack › Not attained/maintained
  • cause Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Temp/humidity/pressure › Conducive to carburetor icing › Contributed to outcome
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Aircraft capability › Maximum weight › Capability exceeded

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instructor: sport pilot
  • Flight time: 750 hours in all
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: fatal

Pilot-Rated Passenger

  • Certificate: sport pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Medical certificate: Sport Pilot
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 1,934 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, July 6, 2016
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,250 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Continental Motors A-65-8F (piston); 2,669 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: M61 Ishpeming MI at 11:45 pm
  • Destination: M61 Ishpeming MI
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 05, 1,600 ft by 125 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 050° at 8 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 63°F (17°C), dew point 50°F (10°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.17 inHg
  • Observation at 11:55 pm from SAW, 13 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

12 documents, released by the NTSB on January 6, 2017. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.