The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN15LA375 · Final report

Robinson Helicopter Company R44 II accident near Carlos, Texas, August 22, 2015

On August 22, 2015 at about 10:42 pm local time, a 2012 Robinson Helicopter Company R44 II, registered N445HS, was substantially damaged in an accident during maneuvering (hover) near Carlos, Texas. It was a business flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were seriously injured. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s improper decision to turn the helicopter toward a tailwind during an out-of-ground-effect hover, which resulted in a loss of tail rotor effectiveness. Contributing to the accident was the accident and lead pilots’ inadequate preflight risk management.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
August 22, 2015 · about 10:42 pm local time
Place
Carlos, Texas · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people were seriously injured.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Robinson Helicopter Company R44 II, built 2012
Registration
N445HS · registry record · serial 13312
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Business flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The commercial pilot was conducting the flight behind another helicopter in order to film the passengers on board the lead helicopter hunting wild hog. At the filming location, the accident pilot initially established a hover about 400 ft above ground level (agl). After the lead pilot radioed to the accident pilot that he was flying too high, the accident pilot descended to about 200 ft agl, which was 100 ft above the lead helicopter. The accident pilot made a right pedal turn away from a headwind of 20 knots in an attempt to keep the lead helicopter in sight. The accident helicopter subsequently entered a right descending spin, which the pilot was unable to arrest. The helicopter subsequently impacted trees, which damaged the main rotor, tail rotor, and fuselage. Examination of the helicopter revealed no evidence of mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. The helicopter was operating in a high-power, low-airspeed condition that required the pilot to be especially aware of wind direction to avoid tailwinds, which can result in a loss of control due to a loss of tail rotor effectiveness. The combination of an out-of-ground-effect hover and the pilot's subsequent turn away from the headwind toward a tailwind of about 20 knots resulted in the loss of tail rotor effectiveness. The flight was the accident pilot's first commercial operation and also the first flight that required him to maintain a hover while close to another helicopter. Neither the accident pilot nor the lead pilot was aware of the helicopter manufacturer's safety notice regarding photo flights, which recommended that pilots flying such operations should have a higher level of experience than the accident pilot had. The lead pilot, who was more experienced, reported that he was concerned about the accident pilot's inexperience relative to the challenging flight but chose to continue with the flight because he wanted to capture the film footage.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of tail rotor effectiveness during maneuvering (hover) defining event
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Prop/rotor parameters › Capability exceeded
  • cause Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › Tailwind › Decision related to condition
  • factor Personnel issues › Task performance › Planning/preparation › (general) › Pilot
  • factor Personnel issues › Task performance › Planning/preparation › (general) › Pilot of other aircraft

Pilot

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instructor: instrument helicopter; instrument: helicopter; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Flight time: 399 hours in all; 83 in this make and model; 32 in the last 90 days; 26 in the last 30 days; 292 as pilot in command; 93 on instruments
  • Last flight review: October 12, 2014
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: serious injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 340 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, August 8, 2015; 5 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,500 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming IO-540-AE1A5 (piston); 340 hours total
  • Operator: Perfect Filler LLC

The flight

  • Departed from: CFD Bryan TX at 9:30 pm
  • Destination: CFD Bryan TX
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 170° at 13 knots, gusting 17
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: a few clouds
  • Temperature: 97°F (36°C), dew point 70°F (21°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.87 inHg
  • Observation at 10:53 pm from KCLL, 15 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

8 documents, released by the NTSB on April 22, 2016. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.