The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN13FA213 · Final report

Schleicher ALEXANDER accident near Littlefield, Texas, March 30, 2013

On March 30, 2013 at about 9:00 pm local time, a Schleicher ALEXANDER (glider), registered N12053, was substantially damaged in an accident during maneuvering (aerobatics) near Littlefield, Texas (Littlefield Municipal Airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s improper decision to conduct aerobatic maneuvers in a glider not approved for such maneuvers. Contributing to the accident was the degradation of the adhesive holding the wing together, which should have been detected either during the last annual inspection or preflight inspection.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
March 30, 2013 · about 9:00 pm local time
Place
Littlefield, Texas · Littlefield Municipal Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people were killed.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Schleicher ALEXANDER K7
Registration
N12053 · no longer on the register · serial 7205
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

Witnesses reported that, the glider, which was not approved for aerobatic maneuvers, was riding thermals about 2,000 feet above the ground when it appeared to exit a thermal and then execute a tight loop, which is considered to be an aerobatic maneuver. Witnesses then heard a loud sound, saw the glider spinning to the ground, and a portion of the right wing separate and fall to the ground. The glider continued to spin until it impacted terrain. An examination of the wreckage revealed that the flight controls were continuous before the wing separated and the airplane impacted terrain. A review of the glider's maintenance logbooks revealed that the annual inspection was accomplished about 12 months before the accident and that the airplane was approved to be in airworthy condition. An inspection recommended by the British Gliding Association, which was intended to reveal glue joint deterioration, had not been completed. An examination of the separated wing section revealed evidence of multiple fractures due to tension and torsion. The condition of the wing's adhesive joints was mostly degraded and poor. The adhesive was very brittle, and cracks and areas of disbonding were observed. Stains and mold were observed on the wing's leading edge interior, indicative of moisture ingress, which can degrade the adhesive bonds and the wood structure. The leading edge ribs were easily pulled apart at the joints, which allowed them to separate without fracturing under minimal force. Despite the condition of the adhesive, it could not be determined whether the wing would have fractured under design load conditions, but the aerobatic maneuver placed the wing under greater load conditions. However, a thorough inspection of the wing interior, either during the last annual inspection or preflight inspection, would likely have revealed evidence of moisture and adhesive disbonding, which should have led to concerns about the airworthiness of the glider.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Aircraft structural failure during maneuvering (aerobatics) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
  • factor Aircraft › Aircraft structures › Wing structure › Spar (on wing) › Damaged/degraded
  • factor Aircraft › Aircraft structures › Wing structure › Spar (on wing) › Not serviced/maintained
  • factor Aircraft › Aircraft structures › Wing structure › Spar (on wing) › Not inspected
  • factor Personnel issues › Task performance › Inspection › Scheduled/routine inspection › Maintenance personnel
  • factor Personnel issues › Action/decision › (general) › (general) › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; rotorcraft: glider
  • Flight time: 12,695 hours in all
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: frt
  • Injury: fatal

Passenger

  • Seat: ctr
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: annual inspection, April 1, 2012
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,060 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed

The flight

  • Departed from: KLIU Littlefield TX at 8:45 pm
  • Destination: KLIU Littlefield TX
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: at 4 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 30,000 ft; a few clouds at 9,000 ft
  • Temperature: 84°F (29°C), dew point 25°F (-4°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.94 inHg
  • Observation at 8:53 pm from KLBB, 32 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.