The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN11CA518 · Final report

Cessna 180D accident near Oscoda, Michigan, July 24, 2011

On July 24, 2011 at about 8:00 pm local time, a Cessna 180D, registered N6425X, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing near Oscoda, Michigan (Oscoda-Wurtsmith airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's failure to retract the landing gear before a water landing. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's failure to use a checklist.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
July 24, 2011 · about 8:00 pm local time
Place
Oscoda, Michigan · Oscoda-Wurtsmith · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 180D · all 180Ds on the register
Registration
N6425X · registry record · serial 18050925
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported that he landed the float-equipped airplane and it nosed over. He said that he had taken off from a paved runway earlier and forgot to retract the wheels for the water landing. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the wings. The pilot reported that there were no mechanical anomalies with the airplane and the accident could have been prevented if he had used the checklist.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Landing gear not configured during landing defining event
  2. Nose over/nose down during landing

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Forgotten action/omission › Pilot
  • factor Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of checklist › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 435 hours in all; 69 in this make and model; 31 in the last 90 days; 16 in the last 30 days; 339 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: June 14, 2011
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 4,510 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, August 14, 2010
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,850 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Cont Motor O-470 SERIES (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: OSC Oscoda MI at 7:55 pm
  • Destination: OSC Oscoda MI
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 02

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 040° at 7 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: a few clouds at 12,000 ft
  • Temperature: 72°F (22°C), dew point 63°F (17°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.00 inHg
  • Observation at 7:53 pm from OSC, 5 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Other NTSB records under N6425X the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

1999-10-14DEN00LA004 · accident near Denver, CO · substantial damage · no injuries

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.