Brantly B2 accident near St. Michael, Alaska, June 25, 2017
On June 25, 2017 at about 8:15 pm local time, a 1961 Brantly B2 (helicopter), registered N5955X, was substantially damaged in an accident during maneuvering (hover) near St. Michael, Alaska. It was an aerial observation flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The pilot’s inadequate supervision of the refueling process, which resulted in a loss of engine power due to water contamination in the helicopter’s fuel system from the fuel drum and subsequent impact with terrain.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- June 25, 2017 · about 8:15 pm local time
- Place
- St. Michael, Alaska · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Brantly B2 B, built 1961 · all B2s on the register
- Registration
- N5955X · no longer on the register · serial 96
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Aerial observation flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The pilot reported that, while in a high-hover profile conducting aerial reindeer herding operations, he decided to make a precautionary landing with the skid-equipped helicopter on "knee-high" tussocks in remote tundra due to several "left yaw movements" followed by an "uncommanded left yaw." The pilot initiated a hovering autorotation from about 15 ft above ground level. During the landing sequence, the left skid assembly was damaged, and the helicopter settled forward and to the left, which resulted in the three main rotor blades impacting the tundra. All three main rotor blades separated midspan due to the impact, and the helicopter sustained substantial damage to the main rotor system and fuselage. After the accident, the pilot spoke with a witness who heard the engine producing "popping" noises and then "quit." At the time of the accident, the pilot reported he did not realize that the engine had lost power. Postaccident examination of the airframe and engine by the pilot revealed no preimpact mechanical malfunctions that would have precluded normal operation. While inspecting the fuel cell, the pilot found 1/8 of a cup of water with about 5 gallons of fuel remaining. During the aerial herding operations, the helicopter was shut down for refueling several times throughout the day, and no hot refueling operations were conducted. The pilot spoke with some local community members who were assisting him on the day of the aerial herding operations. The pilot found that, when the helicopter was last refueled before the accident flight and when the fuel was transferred from a steel drum with a pump system to a plastic jug for pouring in the helicopter, a water separating filter/funnel was not used by one of the local community members who was assisting the pilot with the refueling operations. The individual misunderstood the refueling operations and thought that the fuel filtering process would take place as the fuel was poured directly into the helicopter. Water was subsequently found in the steel drum that was used. The pilot reported that he conducted a preflight check of the helicopter's fuel cell (sump) before the accident flight, and no fuel discrepancies were observed at the time. The Federal Aviation Administration published Advisory Circular 20-125, "Water in Aviation Fuels," which discussed the potential hazards of water in aviation fuels and stated, in part: The pilot in command has the final responsibility to determine that the aircraft is properly serviced. The pilot in command should also be present during the refueling operation to inspect a sample of the fuel from the dispensing unit prior to fueling the aircraft. Refueling from drum storage or cans should be considered as an unsatisfactory operation and one to be avoided whenever possible. All containers of this type should be regarded with suspicion and the contents carefully inspected, identified, and checked for water and other contamination.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Aircraft servicing event during prior to flight
- Off-field or emergency landing during maneuvering (hover)
- Autorotation Attempted remediation/recovery
- Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during landing (flare/touchdown)
- Fuel contamination during maneuvering (hover) defining event
The NTSB's findings
- cause Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Attention › Pilot
- cause Aircraft › Aircraft handling/service › (general) › (general) › Incorrect use/operation
- cause Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Fuel › Fluid condition
Pilot
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: rotorcraft: helicopter
- Flight time: 494.1 hours in all; 55.4 in this make and model; 15 in the last 90 days; 7 in the last 30 days; 433.1 as pilot in command
- Last flight review: March 8, 2017
- Medical certificate: Class 2
- Seat: rgt
- Injury: no injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 837.5 hours
- Last inspection: annual inspection, June 28, 2016
- Maximum gross weight: 1,670 lb
- Seats: 2
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Lycoming IVO-360-A1A (piston); 2,050 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: SMK St Michael AK
- Destination: SMK St Michael AK
- Flight plan: none
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 070° at 11 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: overcast at 4,800 ft
- Temperature: 57°F (14°C), dew point 46°F (8°C)
- Altimeter: 29.95 inHg
- Observation at 7:56 pm from PAMK, 1 miles away
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 | |||
| Passengers | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.
Other NTSB records under N5955X the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
