The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR22FA073 · Final report

Mooney M20C accident near Marana, Arizona, December 31, 2021

On December 31, 2021 at about 8:30 pm local time, a 1968 Mooney M20C, registered N6796N, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute near Marana, Arizona. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s loss of airplane control due to spatial disorientation after entering instrument meteorological conditions. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s impairment due to use of methamphetamine before the flight.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
December 31, 2021 · about 8:30 pm local time
Place
Marana, Arizona · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was killed.
Weather
instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
Aircraft
Mooney M20C, built 1968 · all M20Cs on the register
Registration
N6796N · no longer on the register · serial 680099
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The non-instrument-rated pilot departed into visual meteorological conditions (VMC) on a day cross-country flight. Concerned family members contacted flight service when the pilot was overdue at the destination airport. The wreckage was located 4 days later in dessert terrain about 56 miles from the departure airport. Flight track data indicated that after departure the airplane proceeded northwest toward the destination airport before it turned to the southwest. The airplane continued to the southwest, where it made a series of turns until radar contact was lost. Review of weather information near the accident location at the time of the accident indicated instrument meteorological conditions (IMC), including low ceilings and visibility, were most likely present at the time of the accident. It is unknown if the pilot obtained a preflight weather briefing. All major structural components of the airplane were located within the wreckage path. Postaccident examination of the airframe and engine revealed no evidence of any preexisting anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. Postmortem toxicology testing revealed varying levels of methamphetamine in the pilot’s liver and muscle tissue. The methamphetamine levels detected are consistent with the pilot’s use of methamphetamine before the flight. It is likely that the psychoactive effects from the pilot’s use of methamphetamine contributed to his decision to fly into conditions that he was not trained for. The non-instrument-rated pilot’s flight into IMC would have made airplane control by visual references difficult, especially while maneuvering. When there were no outside visual references, pilots must rely on use of flight instruments to understand their position in space. Based on the postaccident flight track data, the pilot made a series of turns that were inconsistent with his intended flight path and were likely the result of the pilot experiencing spatial disorientation. It is likely the pilot did not reference the flight instruments or was experiencing an increase in workload because of spatial disorientation, and did not recover the airplane from its descent.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control in flight during enroute
  2. Loss of visual reference during enroute defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Psychological › Perception/orientation/illusion › Spatial disorientation › Pilot
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › (general) › Not attained/maintained
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › (general) › (general) › Effect on equipment
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • Personnel issues › Physical › Impairment/incapacitation › Illicit drug › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 542.7 hours in all
  • Last flight review: October 18, 2017
  • Medical certificate: BasicMed (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: unk
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 5,586.4 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, September 28, 2017
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Lycoming O-360-A1D (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: AVQ Marana AZ at 8:00 pm
  • Destination: F70 Temecula CA
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 080° at 8 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 3,800 ft
  • Temperature: 66°F (19°C), dew point 50°F (10°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.54 inHg
  • Observation at 1:35 pm from KAVQ, 56 miles away

Weather report (METAR): KAVQ 312035Z AUTO 08008KT 10SM BKN038 BKN044 OVC090 19/10 A2954 RMK AO2 T01880095=

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

7 documents, released by the NTSB on December 14, 2023. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.