The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR19FA256 · Final report

Piper PA32 accident near La Grande, Oregon, September 8, 2019

On September 8, 2019 at about 5:00 pm local time, a 1968 Piper PA32, registered N6300Z, was destroyed in an accident during enroute (cruise) near La Grande, Oregon. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s decision to continue visual flight rules flight into instrument meteorological conditions, which resulted in spatial disorientation and a loss of control.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
September 8, 2019 · about 5:00 pm local time
Place
La Grande, Oregon · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was killed.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Piper PA32 300, built 1968 · all PA32s on the register
Registration
N6300Z · no longer on the register · serial 32-40487
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot departed on a visual flight rules cross country flight. GPS data revealed that, about 30 minutes into the flight, the airplane began deviating from its previously established on-course heading to the destination. During the last 5 minutes of the flight, the airplane’s altitude and heading varied, and during the last minute of the flight, the airplane climbed about 400 ft and its ground speed slowed from 140 knots (kts) to about 53 kts. The airplane then entered a descent that continued until the end of the recorded data, about 450 ft from the accident site. The fragmentation of the airplane and distribution of the wreckage were consistent with a high-speed impact. Examination of the wreckage revealed no evidence of any preimpact mechanical malfunctions or anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. Weather reports near the departure airport, along the route of flight, and at the destination airport indicated visual meteorological conditions with light rain, 10 statute miles visibility, and overcast cloud ceilings beginning at 3,300 ft above ground level; however, an AIRMET for instrument flight rules conditions and mountain obscuration was valid for the area of the accident site at the time of the accident. Satellite imagery identified cloudy conditions across the accident region, including the accident site, weather radar displayed light rain in the area of the accident site, and witnesses reported rain and heavy fog in the area near the accident site about the time of the accident; therefore, it is likely that the pilot encountered instrument meteorological conditions. The extent of the pilot’s preflight weather planning and what information he may have accessed before departure could not be determined. The pilot held an instrument rating, and the airplane was equipped for instrument flight; however, neither the recency of the pilot’s instrument experience nor his level of instrument proficiency could be determined. Based on the available information, the pilot likely encountered instrument meteorological conditions in flight, which resulted in spatial disorientation, a loss of control, and subsequent impact with terrain.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. VFR encounter with IMC during enroute (cruise) defining event
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent
  3. Loss of control in flight during enroute (cruise)

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Psychological › Perception/orientation/illusion › Spatial disorientation › Pilot
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Low visibility › Contributed to outcome
  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › (general) › Not attained/maintained

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 2,243 hours in all; 2,243 in this make and model
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, September 12, 2018
  • Maximum gross weight: 3,400 lb
  • Seats: 6
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming TI0-540 SER (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: RLD Richland WA at 4:00 pm
  • Destination: ONO Ontario OR
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 300° at 8 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 3,300 ft; clear
  • Temperature: 55°F (13°C), dew point 52°F (11°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.94 inHg
  • Observation at 5:00 pm from KLGD, 17 miles away

Weather report (METAR): METAR KLGD 081656Z AUTO 30008KT 10SM -RA OVC033 13/11 A2994 RMK AO2 SLP275 P0008 T01280111=

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

17 documents, released by the NTSB on September 14, 2021. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.