The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR18LA241 · Final report

Cessna 172 accident near Afton, Wyoming, August 13, 2018

On August 13, 2018 at about 3:08 pm local time, a 1980 Cessna 172, registered N5660J, was substantially damaged in an accident during maneuvering near Afton, Wyoming. It was an aerial observation flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 3 people were seriously injured. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s failure to maintain terrain clearance after an encounter with a downdraft while maneuvering in a valley with a high-density altitude, which resulted in impact with trees and terrain.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
August 13, 2018 · about 3:08 pm local time
Place
Afton, Wyoming · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
3 people were seriously injured.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 172 N, built 1980 · all 172s on the register
Registration
N5660J · no longer on the register · serial 17273825
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Aerial observation flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

An airline transport pilot and two passengers departed on an aerial observation flight in mountainous terrain. While flying in a valley, the pilot reported that he experienced downdrafts, which made it unlikely that the airplane would clear the ridge lines in front of the airplane. The pilot performed a steep 180° left turn to exit from the high terrain. However, after completing the turn, the airplane was unable to climb over terrain and struck several trees before impacting the ground, which resulted in substantial damage to the wings and fuselage. The pilot reported no preaccident mechanical failures or malfunctions with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation. The airplane's weight and balance was calculated as about 256 pounds below the maximum gross weight limit, and the density altitude at the accident was calculated as about 8,765 ft mean sea level (msl). A weather study of the accident area identified no significant winds, turbulence, or low-level wind shear present or forecast. The study did identify a surface-based inversion that existed to about 500 ft above ground level (agl). Additionally, another pilot in a different airplane stated that moderate turbulence was present near the accident area about 18 minutes before the accident. Due to a combination of the airplane's high gross weight, a high-density altitude, a temperature inversion, maneuvering at a steep bank in order to avoid high terrain, and with potential downdrafts, the pilot dissipated the airplane's airspeed and altitude, and approached a stall. With no altitude available to increase the airspeed after the left turn and already at full power, the airplane continued to descend until it struck trees and impacted terrain.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Other weather encounter during maneuvering
  2. Controlled flight into terrain or object (CFIT) during maneuvering defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • factor Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Temp/humidity/pressure › High density altitude › Effect on equipment
  • factor Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › Downdraft › Effect on equipment
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Altitude › Not attained/maintained
  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, flight instructor, commercial pilot, private
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: glider; instructor: helicopter; instructor: instrument airplane; instructor: instrument helicopter; instrument: airplane; instrument: helicopter; rotorcraft: glider; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Flight time: 17,383 hours in all; 2,600 in this make and model; 179 in the last 90 days; 67 in the last 30 days; 15,346 as pilot in command; 10,914 on instruments
  • Last flight review: May 2, 2016
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: serious injuries

Passenger

  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: serious injuries

Passenger

  • Seat: rear
  • Injury: serious injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 4,418.7 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, May 22, 2018
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,299 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-360-A4M (piston); 4,419 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: AFO Afton WY at 2:50 pm
  • Destination: AFO Afton WY

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 050° at 5 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 11,000 ft
  • Temperature: 55°F (13°C), dew point 43°F (6°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.22 inHg
  • Observation at 3:15 pm from AFO, 16 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers2

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

8 documents, released by the NTSB on August 5, 2021. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.