The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR16LA003 · Final report

Cessna TU206G accident near Fall City, Washington, October 3, 2015

On October 3, 2015 at about 1:35 am local time, a 1993 Cessna TU206G, registered N206HL, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing near Fall City, Washington. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was seriously injured. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The airplane’s collision with the ground short of the runway for reasons that could not be determined based on the available evidence.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
October 3, 2015 · about 1:35 am local time
Place
Fall City, Washington · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was seriously injured.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna TU206G, built 1993 · all TU206Gs on the register
Registration
N206HL · no longer on the register · serial U20604986
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The private pilot was on approach to his home airport when the airplane crashed behind a restaurant about 1 mile from the airport and sustained damage to the wings and left fuel tank. The pilot was seriously injured and did not respond to repeated requests for information about the circumstances of the accident. The postaccident airframe and engine examination revealed that the No. 2 cylinder top spark plug had combustion deposits on the electrode and the insulator was broken; however, the examination revealed no other evidence of mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. Although it is possible that the engine experienced a degradation of power that could have resulted in the pilot's inability to maintain altitude to reach the airport, the reason for the airplane's collision with the ground short of the runway could not be determined based on the available evidence.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Unknown or undetermined during landing defining event
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during landing

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Not determined › Not determined › (general) › (general) › Unknown/Not determined

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land; single-engine sea; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 0 hours in all; 0 in this make and model
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: serious injuries

The aircraft

  • Landing gear: fixed

The flight

  • Destination: Fall City WA
  • Flight plan: IFR

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 160° at 15 knots
  • Visibility: 6 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 800 ft; clear
  • Temperature: 55°F (13°C), dew point 54°F (12°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.04 inHg
  • Observation at 1:30 am from RTN

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

2 documents, released by the NTSB on September 24, 2019. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.