The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR14CA003 · Final report

Air Tractor INC AT 402B accident near Wellton, Arizona, October 2, 2013

On October 2, 2013 at about 4:30 am local time, a 2009 Air Tractor INC AT 402B, registered N402TR, was substantially damaged in an accident during maneuvering near Wellton, Arizona. It was an aerial application (crop spraying) flight under agricultural flying rules (Part 137). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s distracted attention and failure to maintain sufficient altitude to clear terrain while maneuvering in dark night conditions.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
October 2, 2013 · about 4:30 am local time
Place
Wellton, Arizona · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Air Tractor INC AT 402B B, built 2009 · all AT 402Bs on the register
Registration
N402TR · no longer on the register · serial 402B-1216
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Aerial application (crop spraying) flight · agricultural flying rules (Part 137)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported that he was reading a map in an effort to identify the correct field to spray while maneuvering at low altitude in dark night conditions. While maneuvering in a turn the pilot did not realize the airplane was descending and subsequently collided with terrain. The wings and fuselage were substantially damaged. The pilot reported no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Controlled flight into terrain or object (CFIT) during maneuvering defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Attention › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Altitude › Not attained/maintained
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Light condition › Dark › Effect on operation

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 4,500 hours in all; 3,000 in this make and model
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: ctr
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 3,094 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, September 16, 2013; 68 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 7,000 lb
  • Seats: 1
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: P&W PT 6-34 AG (turboprop); 3,093 hours total
  • Operator: Tri Rotor Spray And Chemical INC

The flight

  • Departed from: Somerton AZ at 4:00 am
  • Destination: Wellton AZ
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: night, dark
  • Wind: from 090° at 3 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 70°F (21°C), dew point 0°F (-18°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.97 inHg

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.