The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR13LA214 · Final report

Cessna 421A accident near Oakland, California, May 1, 2013

On May 1, 2013 at about 9:45 pm local time, a 1979 Cessna 421A, registered N216WA, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing (landing roll) near Oakland, California (Oakland International Airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

A failure of the left main landing gear pivot bolt in overstress during landing.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
May 1, 2013 · about 9:45 pm local time
Place
Oakland, California · Oakland International Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 421A, built 1979 · all 421As on the register
Registration
N216WA · no longer on the register · serial 421A-0032
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot and pilot-rated owner reported that during the approach for a full stop landing, they both independently verified that the landing gear was extended via the cockpit indicator lights. The touchdown was normal, but immediately thereafter, the left main landing gear collapsed, and the airplane exited the left side of the runway. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed that a bolt that functioned as the pivot axis for the landing gear actuation and downlock mechanism had failed in overstress. The airplane experienced a previous failure of that left main gear pivot bolt about 6 years prior to this accident.  The pivot bolt was the subject of two dedicated inspection procedures that were first issued by the airplane manufacturer about 14 years after the airplane was manufactured, and about 20 years prior to the accident. In combination, the intervals for those two inspection procedures were based on hours in service, calendar years, and number of landings. Review of the maintenance records revealed that the bolt had failed when it had accumulated about 227 hours in service, over the almost 6 years. The records did not indicate whether the bolt had been inspected in accordance with the manufacturer-recommended dedicated inspection, which specified intervals of 1,000 hours, 3 years, or 500 landings, but those inspections were not mandated by the FAA.  A 2006 investigation by the Spanish investigation agency CIAIAC of a Cessna 421 landing gear collapse determined that a pivot bolt failure was caused by loading in excess of the design criteria, which was precipitated by improper adjustment (referred to as "rigging") of the extension-retraction mechanism. The Spanish report cited multiple previous similar bolt failures that resulted in incidents and accident. As part of this subject investigation, a limited survey of events subsequent to the Spanish incident revealed several additional similar landing gear collapse accidents in model 421 airplanes, both in the U.S. and other countries. In some of these cases, improper rigging was cited as the cause, while some remained undetermined as to the cause. Although the historical evidence strongly indicated that the pivot bolt failure in this subject airplane was the result of improper rigging, accident damage precluded the determination of the airplane's pre-accident rigging status. The CIAIAC issued a formal safety recommendation to Cessna to improve its rigging instructions, but Cessna did not implement any corrective actions as a result of that safety recommendation. As a result of this subject accident, the FAA initiated an effort to reduce the inspection intervals on the pivot bolt, and emphasize the need for proper rig checks on an annual basis, for the Cessna 421 airplane.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Landing gear collapse during landing (landing roll) defining event
  2. Sys/Comp malf/fail (non-power) during landing (landing roll)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Landing gear system › Gear extension and retract sys › Failure
  • factor Organizational issues › Development › Design › Equipment design › Manufacturer

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 6,270 hours in all; 200 in this make and model; 27 in the last 90 days; 18 in the last 30 days; 6,200 as pilot in command; 4,500 on instruments
  • Last flight review: October 27, 2012
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 3,684 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, January 25, 2013; 11 hours since
  • Seats: 7
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: Continental GTSIO-520 (piston); 3,684 hours total
  • Engine 2: Continental GTSIO-520 (piston); 3,684 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: CCR Concord CA at 8:30 pm
  • Destination: OAK Oakland CA
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 27R, 5,454 ft by 150 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 310° at 12 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 79°F (26°C), dew point 48°F (9°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.02 inHg
  • Observation at 9:53 pm from OAK, 5 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew2

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.