The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR13FA086 · Final report

Beech V35A accident near Woody, California, January 7, 2013

On January 7, 2013, a Beech V35A, registered N35SD, was destroyed in an accident during enroute (descent) near Woody, California. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

An in-flight encounter with icing conditions during descent, which resulted in the airplane exceeding its critical angle-of-attack and experiencing an aerodynamic stall followed by an in-flight breakup.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
January 7, 2013
Place
Woody, California · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people were killed.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Beech V35A · all V35As on the register
Registration
N35SD · registry record · serial D-8812
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

During a visual flight rules cross-country flight, air traffic control was providing flight-following services. The pilot informed the controller that there was cloud cover ahead and requested an instrument flight rules clearance and approach to the destination airport. The controller granted the clearance and then instructed the pilot to maintain 14,000 ft; the pilot read back the clearance. The pilot then requested a lower altitude and was advised to expect a lower altitude in 10 to 12 miles. The pilot was subsequently cleared for a descent to 7,000 ft and issued arrival instructions. Two minutes later, the controller advised the accident pilot of a pilot report of icing in the area. One minute later, the controller issued a clearance to 6,000 ft but received no response from the pilot. The controller issued the clearance again, and the pilot acknowledged the instruction. The controller relayed a nearby outside air temperature but received no response from the pilot. The controller made several attempts to contact the pilot and also asked another pilot to try to establish contact; all attempts were unsuccessful. Two minutes later, radar contact was lost. The wreckage was located about 1 mile from the last radar return and was distributed over the terrain for about 1/2 mile, indicating that an in-flight breakup had occurred. A postaccident examination of the airframe or engine revealed no anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. A weather study indicated that the airplane likely encountered light-to-moderate precipitation, especially near the end of the radar flight track. Precipitation and clouds would have reduced visibility. Considering the environmental freezing level, the airplane likely encountered supercooled liquid water and snowflakes about the time that voice communication was lost. Pilot reports in the immediate area described increasing instrument meteorological conditions (IMC) along with light-to-moderate icing conditions. The reports described the flight conditions as mostly smooth with some light turbulence when passing in and out of cloud tops. Along with the likely IMC, the airplane likely experienced moderate or greater icing conditions around the accident time. The airplane likely developed ice on the wings, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall followed by a loss of control and in-flight breakup during the descent.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control in flight during enroute (descent) defining event
  2. Aircraft structural failure during enroute (descent)
  3. Structural icing during enroute (descent)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Angle of attack › Capability exceeded
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Airspeed › Attain/maintain not possible
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft structures › Empennage structure › (general) › Capability exceeded
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft structures › Wing structure › (general) › Capability exceeded
  • cause Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Temp/humidity/pressure › Conducive to structural icing › Ability to respond/compensate

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 7,000 hours in all; 1,000 in this make and model
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 6,646 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, September 20, 2012
  • Seats: 6
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Continental Motors, Inc IO-550-B12B (piston); 1,500 hours total
  • Operator: Floyd Johnston Construction CO INC

The flight

  • Departed from: Imperial CA at 10:15 pm
  • Destination: FAT Fresno CA
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 330° at 6 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 3,600 ft
  • Temperature: 50°F (10°C), dew point 43°F (6°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.07 inHg
  • Observation at 11:54 pm from KBFL, 18 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.