The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR11LA094 · Final report

Rockwell International S-2R accident near Oakley, California, January 10, 2011

On January 10, 2011 at about 6:57 pm local time, a Rockwell International S-2R, registered N4977X, was substantially damaged in an accident during maneuvering (low-alt flying) near Oakley, California. It was an aerial application (crop spraying) flight under agricultural flying rules (Part 137). 1 person was killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

An in-flight collision with an unmarked meteorological evaluation tower (MET) during an aerial application flight due to the pilot's failure to see and avoid the obstacle. Contributing to the accident was the lack of visual conspicuity of the MET and the lack of information available to the pilot about the MET before the flight.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
January 10, 2011 · about 6:57 pm local time
Place
Oakley, California · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was killed.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Rockwell International S-2R · all S-2Rs on the register
Registration
N4977X · no longer on the register · serial 5022R
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Aerial application (crop spraying) flight · agricultural flying rules (Part 137)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot was initiating an aerial application to a field when the airplane collided with a 198-foot-tall, unpainted metal meteorological evaluation tower (MET). No information about the MET was distributed in any Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) notices or other publications for pilots, and the MET was not equipped with any markings or obstruction lights for visual conspicuity. For these reasons, the pilot likely had limited opportunity to become aware of the MET before the flight, and his ability to detect it visually in flight was extremely limited. Although the pilot’s toxicological results were positive for dextromethorphan (an over-the-counter cough suppressant) and dextrorphan (a metabolite of dextromethorphan) in the urine, the substances were not noted in the blood; therefore, it is likely that some time had passed since the pilot had used the medication. Additionally, these substances would not normally be expected to result in any impairment. METs are used to measure wind data throughout the United States. They can be assembled quickly and can be constructed of galvanized tubing with guy wires used as support. Because many METs (like the accident MET) are just below the 200-foot threshold at which FAA regulations would require the applicant to notify the FAA of the MET and to provide a lighting and marking plan for FAA assessment, many METs are unmarked, unlighted, and not referenced in any FAA notices or publications for pilots. Although the FAA in 2011 approved an update to Advisory Circular (AC) 70/7460-1K, Obstruction Marking and Lighting, that will provide recommended guidance on marking METs, ACs are only advisory in nature. Because of this, MET constructions will likely continue to meet only the minimum requirements and, thus, will remain a hazard to pilots operating at low altitudes. In March 2011, the NTSB published Safety Alert SA-016 to educate pilots about the flight-safety issues presented by METs. The Safety Alert is available at the NTSB’s website at http://www.ntsb.gov/safety/safety_alerts.html.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during maneuvering (low-alt flying) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Tower/antenna (incl guy wires) › Awareness of condition
  • Organizational issues › Support/oversight/monitoring › Oversight › (general) › FAA/Regulator
  • cause Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Tower/antenna (incl guy wires) › Response/compensation
  • cause Personnel issues › Psychological › Perception/orientation/illusion › Perception › Pilot
  • factor Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Tower/antenna (incl guy wires) › Availability of related info

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 26,000 hours in all
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: ctr
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 7,362 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, April 7, 2010
  • Maximum gross weight: 7,860 lb
  • Seats: 1
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Honeywell TPE-331 (turboprop); 0 hours total
  • Operator: Alexander AG Flying Service INC

The flight

  • Departed from: 9CL9 Walnut Grove CA at 6:40 pm
  • Destination: Oakley CA
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 040° at 8 knots, gusting 14
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: scat at 20,000 ft
  • Temperature: 45°F (7°C), dew point 27°F (-3°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.25 inHg
  • Observation at 6:53 pm from CCR, 22 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Other NTSB records under N4977X the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

1994-03-11LAX94LA158 · accident near Tacna, AZ · substantial damage · minor injuries
1989-09-14LAX89DUJ10 · accident near Yuma, AZ · substantial damage · serious injuries

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.