The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR09FA192 · Final report

Piper PA-24-250 accident near San Diego, California, April 11, 2009

On April 11, 2009 at about 5:54 pm local time, a Piper PA-24-250, registered N7690P, was destroyed in an accident during enroute (descent) near San Diego, California. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were killed. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's failure to maintain control during an en route cruise descent through multiple cloud layers, resulting in an in-flight breakup.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
April 11, 2009 · about 5:54 pm local time
Place
San Diego, California · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people were killed.
Weather
instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
Aircraft
Piper PA-24-250 · all PA-24-250s on the register
Registration
N7690P · no longer on the register · serial 24-2900
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

During the pilot's preflight weather briefing for the cross-country flight, he was informed that while a portion of his anticipated hour-long flight could likely be flown under visual flight rules, instrument meteorological conditions, including multiple cloud layers, could be expected approaching his destination. The destination area was covered by a marine cloud layer, with cloud tops of 5,500 feet. En route, the pilot cruised at 7,000 feet. Initially, all air traffic control (ATC) communications with the pilot were routine. An airport located about 6 miles from the accident site reported a broken sky condition at 2,500 and 3,100 feet, and an overcast sky condition at 4,800 feet. As the pilot entered this area, located about 29 miles north of his destination, he informed the terminal radar approach controller that he was descending from 6,200 to 4,000 feet msl. A radar controller acknowledged the pilot's statement. Two and one-quarter minutes later the radar controller instructed the pilot to descend to 2,600 feet, and "keep your speed up." About 5 seconds later, the pilot responded "two thous." The remainder of the pilot's transmission was either interrupted or not recorded, and there were no further communications with the pilot. A review of the recorded radar data and the wreckage distribution evidence indicated that the airplane broke apart after entering instrument meteorological conditions. The structural failure occurred while the airplane was descending at 6,000 feet per minute and in a clockwise turn. The subsequent examination of the airplane revealed that both wings failed in an upward (positive G) direction, consistent with a pilot-induced structural overload. Thereafter, a portion of the right wing impacted the stabilator's right side, which caused it to separate from the airplane. No evidence of any preexisting structural weakness was found during the examination of the heavily fire-damaged main wreckage.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control in flight during enroute (descent) defining event
  2. Aircraft structural failure during uncontrolled descent
  3. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › (general) › Not attained/maintained
  • cause Personnel issues › Psychological › Perception/orientation/illusio › Spatial disorientation › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Clouds › Contributed to outcome
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft structures › Wing structure › Spar (on wing) › Capability exceeded

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 820 hours in all; 370 in this make and model; 20 in the last 90 days
  • Last flight review: August 2, 2009
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: unk
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: annual inspection, March 1, 2009
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,800 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Lycoming O-540 SERIES (piston); 0 hours total
  • Fire on the ground

The flight

  • Departed from: WHP Los Angeles CA at 5:04 pm
  • Destination: SDM San Diego CA
  • Flight plan: IFR

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 210° at 5 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 2,500 ft
  • Temperature: 55°F (13°C), dew point 48°F (9°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.00 inHg
  • Observation at 5:55 pm from NKX, 5 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.