The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB NYC05FA026 · Final report

Gulfstream Aerospace G-IV accident near Teterboro, New Jersey, December 1, 2004

On December 1, 2004 at about 9:23 pm local time, a Gulfstream Aerospace G-IV, registered GGMAC, was substantially damaged in an accident near Teterboro, New Jersey (Teterboro Airport). It was flown under non-U.S. commercial rules. No one was hurt; 9 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The flightcrew's inadvertent engagement of the autothrottle system, and their failure to recognize the engagement during landing, which resulted in a runway excursion. Factors were the lack of autothrottle switch guards, lack of an autothrottle engagement audible tone, and gusty winds.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
December 1, 2004 · about 9:23 pm local time
Place
Teterboro, New Jersey · Teterboro Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 9 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Gulfstream Aerospace G-IV · all G-IVs on the register
Registration
GGMAC · no longer on the register · serial 1058
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Flight · non-U.S. commercial rules

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The flight was cleared for the ILS Runway 19 approach, circle-to-land on Runway 24; a 6,013-foot-long, 150-foot wide, asphalt runway. The auto throttle and autopilot were disengaged during the approach, about 800 feet agl. However, the auto throttle reengaged just prior to touchdown, about 35 feet agl. The flightcrew did not recall reengaging the auto throttle, and were not aware of the autothrottle reengagement. According to the auto throttle computers, the reengagement was commanded through one of the Engage/Disengage paddle switches located on each power lever. The target airspeed set for the auto throttle system was 138 knots. After touchdown, as the airplane decelerated below 138 knots, the auto throttle system gradually increased the power levers in an attempt to maintain the target airspeed. Without the power levers in the idle position, the ground spoilers and thrust reversers would not deploy. While the flightcrew was pulling up on the thrust reverser levers, they may not have initially provided enough aft force on the power levers (15 to 32 lbs.) to override and disconnect the auto throttle system. The flight data recorder indicated that the autothrottle system disengaged 16 seconds after the weight-on-wheels switches were activated in ground mode. As the airplane neared the end of the runway, the pilot engaged the emergency brake, and the airplane departed the right side of the runway. The auto throttle Engage/Disengage paddle switches were not equipped with switch guards. Although the autothrottle system provided an audible tone when disengaged, it did not provide a tone when engaged. The reported wind about the time of the accident was from 290 degrees at 16 knots, gusting to 25 knots, with a peak wind from 300 degrees at 32 knots.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 10,000 hours in all; 1,000 in this make and model
  • Last flight review: August 1, 2004
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

Co-pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; instructor: helicopter; instructor: instrument helicopter; instrument: airplane; instrument: helicopter; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Flight time: 8,000 hours in all; 2,000 in this make and model
  • Last flight review: June 1, 2004
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 7,452 hours
  • Last inspection: continuous airworthiness programme, July 1, 2004; 245 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 75,000 lb
  • Seats: 18
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: Rolls-Royce TAY 611R (turbofan); 0 hours total
  • Engine 2: Rolls-Royce TAY 611R (turbofan); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: EGGW Luton at 1:23 pm
  • Destination: TEB Teterboro NJ
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • Runway 24, 6,013 ft by 150 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 290° at 16 knots, gusting 25
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: a few clouds at 6,000 ft
  • Temperature: 52°F (11°C), dew point 34°F (1°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.62 inHg
  • Observation at 9:51 pm from TEB

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Crew3
Passengers6

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.