The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB MIA96LA151 · Final report

Cessna 182 accident near Crestview, Florida, June 6, 1996

On June 6, 1996 at about 9:04 pm local time, a Cessna 182, registered N5464B, was substantially damaged in an accident near Crestview, Florida (Triple B airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person had minor injuries; 1 other was unhurt. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

Failure of the pilot-in-command to maintain the proper descent rate on landing resulting in separation of the nose landing gear after touchdown. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's lack of experience in the type of operation.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
June 6, 1996 · about 9:04 pm local time
Place
Crestview, Florida · Triple B · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person had minor injuries; 1 other was unhurt.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 182 · all 182s on the register
Registration
N5464B · no longer on the register · serial 33464
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot stated that he elected to land to the south on the 1,600-foot grass runway due to the prevailing winds at the departure airport and he had never landed at the airstrip before. He entered the pattern to land and with full flaps extended, the airplane touched down hard on the nose landing gear, bounced, then touched down and nosed over. Examination of the runway revealed a 1 1/2 inch deep ground scar made by the nose landing gear about 120 feet from the approach end of the runway. The separated nose landing gear was located about 250 feet from the approach end of the runway. The pilot further stated that he has no experience flying into short runways.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

Pilot

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 1,197 hours in all; 430 in this make and model; 117 in the last 90 days; 70 in the last 30 days; 1,102 as pilot in command; 265 on instruments
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (valid medical--no waivers/lim.)
  • Seat: left

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 9,386 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, March 18, 1996; 86 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,550 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Continental O-470-M/L (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: CEW at 9:00 pm
  • Destination: 32J
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 18, 1,600 ft by 100 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 210° at 6 knots
  • Visibility: 7 statute miles
  • Sky: scat at 3,000 ft
  • Temperature: 90°F (32°C), dew point 63°F (17°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.00 inHg
  • Observation at 8:50 pm from CEW, 3 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.