The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB LAX91LA092 · Final report

Cessna 150M accident near Buckeye, Arizona, February 6, 1991

On February 6, 1991 at about 5:31 pm local time, a Cessna 150M, registered N9433U, was substantially damaged in an accident near Buckeye, Arizona. It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

THAT MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL FAILED TO PROPERLY INSTALL THE WINGS BY NOT RECONNECTING THE BOLTS AT THE BELLCRANK AND PERFORMED AN INADEQUATE ANNUAL INSPECTION.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
February 6, 1991 · about 5:31 pm local time
Place
Buckeye, Arizona · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 150M · all 150Ms on the register
Registration
N9433U · no longer on the register · serial 1507838
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

THE CFI AND NONCERTIFICATED STUDENT PILOT DEPARTED GOODYEAR, AZ, ON A DUAL INSTRUCTIONAL FLIGHT. WHILE PRACTICING GROUND REFERENCE MANEUVERS THE AIRPLANE SUSTAINED A LOSS OF AILERON CONTROL. THE CFI EXECUTED A FORCED LANDING INTO A DRYWASH. THE AIRPLANE COLLIDED WITH A BERM DURING THE LANDING ROLL. THE WRECKAGE EXAMINATION DISCLOSED THAT ONE OF THE AILERON CABLES DISCONNECTED FROM THE BELLCRANK. THE CONNECTING NUT AND BOLT WAS NOT LOCATED. ANOTHER BOLT, ALTHOUGH ATTACHED TO THE BELLCRANK, DID NOT CONTAIN A CORRESPONDING NUT. BOTH WINGS WERE REINSTALLED ON THE AIRPLANE ABOUT 22 MONTHS BEFORE THE ACCIDENT. THE LAST ANNUAL INSPECTION WAS PERFORMED ABOUT 3 MONTHS BEFORE THE ACCIDENT. THE SAME MECHANIC PERFORMED THE REINSTALLATION OF BOTH WINGS AND THE LAST ANNUAL INSPECTION.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

Pilot

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 1,200 hours in all; 700 in this make and model; 240 in the last 90 days; 80 in the last 30 days; 1,085 as pilot in command; 800 on instruments
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (valid medical--w/ waivers/lim.)
  • Seat: unk

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 3,727 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, November 7, 1990; 58 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,600 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Continental O-200-A (piston); 0 hours total
  • Operator: Action Aviation

The flight

  • Departed from: GEU Glendale AZ at 4:45 pm
  • Flight plan: not recorded
  • Runway 0
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 080° at 20 knots
  • Visibility: 60 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 0°F (-18°C), dew point 0°F (-18°C)

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Crew2

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.