The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB LAX08LA253 · Final report

Amateur-built Lancair ES accident near Cliffdell, Washington, August 1, 2008

On August 1, 2008 at about 9:33 pm local time, a amateur-built Lancair ES, registered N45EL, was destroyed in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Cliffdell, Washington. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control while in cruise flight due to spatial disorientation. Contributing to the accident was turbulence and clouds.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
August 1, 2008 · about 9:33 pm local time
Place
Cliffdell, Washington · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people were killed.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Amateur-built Lancair ES
Registration
N45EL · no longer on the register · serial 051996-ECL
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

During the instrument-flight-rules flight at 11,000 feet mean sea level, the pilot's last transmission to air traffic control confirmed his altimeter setting. Shortly thereafter, radar data indicated that the airplane started a descending right-hand turn. The final radar return was at 9,700 feet msl. The airplane wreckage was located about 1 mile west of the final radar return, at a terrain elevation of 3,830 feet. The debris field was consistent with an in-flight breakup, with airplane wreckage distributed over a distance of 0.5 miles. A study of the meteorology in the vicinity at the time of the accident indicated that a broken to overcast ceiling existed between 5,000 to 6,000 feet msl and extended up to 14,000 feet msl. Satellite imagery depicted cloud top temperatures of -1 to -3 degrees C between 11,000 and 12,000 feet msl. The location of the last radar return was immediately downwind of Mt. Rainier and the sounding wind profile indicated favorable conditions for mountain wave formation. Digital photos of Mt. Rainier taken a few minutes before the accident were recovered from a camera onboard the airplane. The images depict a clear view of clouds surrounding Mt. Rainier and that the airplane was operating immediately above a broken-to-overcast cloud layer, in visual meteorological conditions. The radar track combined with weather radar imagery and satellite imagery indicated that the airplane was in instrument meteorological conditions (IMC) at the time it entered the descending right turn and dropped below the radar floor. Flight performance data recovered from cockpit instrumentation indicate that 5 minutes prior to the accident the airplane experienced continuous turbulence ranging from 0.77 to 1.5 vertical g's, consistent with a mountain wave encounter. Upon entering IMC conditions, the airplane began a right turn that developed into a spiral descent. During the last few seconds of flight the airplane was oriented 88.6 degrees nose down, 113 degrees angle of bank, and 290 knots. Upon exiting the bottom of the cloud layer, at 6,135 msl, the airplane experienced a rapid onset of g's that exceeded the strength of the airplane. The sudden onset of g-load is constant with the pilot's attempt to recover from the rapid descent and unusual attitude.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control in flight during enroute (cruise) defining event
  2. Aircraft structural failure during uncontrolled descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • cause Personnel issues › Psychological › Perception/orientation/illusio › Spatial disorientation › Pilot
  • Aircraft › Aircraft structures › Wing structure › (general) › Capability exceeded
  • factor Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Turbulence › Terrain induced turbulence › Effect on operation
  • factor Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Below VFR minima › Effect on operation

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 592 hours in all; 266 in this make and model
  • Last flight review: May 14, 2008
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: unk
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 267 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, April 5, 2008
  • Maximum gross weight: 3,200 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Teledyne Continental Motors IO-550 (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: PAKT Ketchikan AK at 10:57 am
  • Destination: KU76 Mountain Home ID
  • Flight plan: IFR

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 290° at 9 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 7,000 ft; scat at 800 ft
  • Temperature: 52°F (11°C), dew point 46°F (8°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.01 inHg
  • Observation at 10:23 pm from KSMP, 13 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.