The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB LAX08FA134 · Final report

Extra Flugzeugproduktions-Gmbh EA-300/L accident near Queen Creek, Arizona, May 9, 2008

On May 9, 2008 at about 8:17 pm local time, a Extra Flugzeugproduktions-Gmbh EA-300/L, registered N133EE, was substantially damaged in an accident during maneuvering (aerobatics) near Queen Creek, Arizona (Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The loss of aircraft control due to an undetermined rudder malfunction.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
May 9, 2008 · about 8:17 pm local time
Place
Queen Creek, Arizona · Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people were killed.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Extra Flugzeugproduktions-Gmbh EA-300/L
Registration
N133EE · registry record · serial 09
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The operator noted that the airplane was overdue from a practice upset recovery training flight. Shortly thereafter, the wreckage was located in flat desert terrain about 10 miles east of the airport. The two occupants were located approximately 50 feet from the airplane wreckage and were wearing parachutes. The instructor pilot’s parachute was found to have been activated and partially deployed. The pilot under instruction's parachute had not been activated. Examination of onboard video and audio recordings revealed that the pilot under instruction was seated in the front cockpit and the instructor pilot was seated in the rear cockpit. The crew intended to perform a maneuver that consisted of the first half as a climbing vertical loop with a snap-roll executed at the top, then continue through the back half of the loop. The pilot under instruction, in the front seat, had the controls for this maneuver. At the top of the loop, as the airplane entered into the snap-roll portion of the maneuver, the airplane’s nose dropped and it entered an erect spin. The pilot in the front cockpit stated that something broke. The instructor in the rear cockpit verbalized the recover procedures, then concurred that there was something wrong with the rudder; he released the canopy and gave the command to get out. The pilot in the front cockpit released his harness and moved to sit on the left-hand canopy rail over a period of 14 seconds. It was not until the front pilot was completely out of his seat before the video showed the rear pilot moving to position himself on the left canopy rail, which took 9 seconds. They both fell backwards out of the cockpit nearly simultaneously 23 seconds after the canopy had been released. The estimated altitude that the airplane was at when the crew bailed out was 246 feet above ground level. Multiple examinations of the rudder system did not reveal any evidence of a rudder malfunction or jam.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control in flight during maneuvering (aerobatics) defining event
  2. Aerodynamic stall/spin during maneuvering (aerobatics)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Flight control system › Rudder control system › Malfunction
  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Delayed action › Flight crew
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › (general) › Attain/maintain not possible

Flight instructor

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 2,208 hours in all; 269 in this make and model
  • Last flight review: April 25, 2008
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rear
  • Injury: fatal

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; multi-engine sea; single-engine land; single-engine sea; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Flight time: 6,100 hours in all
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: frt
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 1,734 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, April 17, 2008
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,918 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming AEIO-540 (piston); 0 hours total
  • Operator: Aviation Performance Solutions

The flight

  • Departed from: KIWA Queens Creek AZ at 7:43 pm
  • Destination: KIWA
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 310° at 10 knots
  • Visibility: 30 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 20,000 ft; scat at 15,000 ft
  • Temperature: 91°F (33°C), dew point 23°F (-5°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.75 inHg
  • Observation at 7:35 pm from KIWA, 10 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew2

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.