The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB GAA19CA346 · Final report

Cessna 152 and Cessna 152 accident near Greenville, Texas, June 11, 2019

On June 11, 2019 at about 8:30 pm local time, 2 aircraft, Cessna 152 (N152TR) and Cessna 152 (N6132Q), were involved in the same accident near Greenville, Texas (Majors Airport). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The passing pilot’s failure to maintain clearance from the airplane that he was attempting to pass during taxi operations. Contributing to the accident was the passing pilot's distraction due to looking at his on-board navigation device while attempting to pass the other airplane.
The passing pilot’s failure to maintain clearance from the airplane that he was attempting to pass during taxi operations. Contributing to the accident was the passing pilot's distraction due to looking at his on-board navigation device while attempting to pass the other airplane.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
June 11, 2019 · about 8:30 pm local time
Place
Greenville, Texas · Majors Airport · map
Type
Accident · collision on the ground
Injuries
No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft 1
Cessna 152 No Series, built 1978 · all 152s on the register
Registration
N152TR · registry record · serial 15281247
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
Aircraft 2
Cessna 152 No Series, built 1981 · all 152s on the register
Registration
N6132Q · registry record · serial 15285156
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative for the Cessna 152 final · quoted from the NTSB record

According to a flight school representative, two solo pilot-rated students were performing pilot-in-command, skills-building training flights. The pilots were taxiing their airplanes to the runway when the pilot in the lead airplane pulled to the right side of the taxiway to allow the pilot in the other airplane to pass. The pilot of the passing airplane was looking at his onboard navigation device as he attempted to pass on the left side of the lead airplane, and his airplane's right wing struck the lead airplane's left wing. Both pilots shut down their airplanes, exited them, and assessed the damage and determined that the damage was minimal, so they departed for the next leg of their training flight. After that flight, flight school maintenance personnel examined the airplanes and found that the lead airplane's left wing aileron and the passing airplane's three right-wing ribs had sustained substantial damage. Both pilots reported that there were no preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplanes that would have precluded normal operation.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The NTSB's narrative for the Cessna 152 final · quoted from the NTSB record

According to a flight school representative, two solo, pilot-rated students were performing pilot-in-command, skills-building training flights. The pilots were taxiing their airplanes to the runway when the pilot in the lead airplane pulled to the right side of the taxiway to allow the pilot in the other airplane to pass. The pilot of the passing airplane was looking at his onboard navigation device as he attempted to pass on the left side of the lead airplane, and his airplane's right wing struck the lead airplane's left wing. Both pilots shut down their airplanes, exited them, and assessed the damage and determined that the damage was minimal, so they departed for the next leg of their training flight. After that flight, flight school maintenance personnel examined the airplanes and found that the lead airplane's left wing aileron and the passing airplane's three right-wing ribs had sustained substantial damage. Both pilots reported that there were no preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplanes that would have precluded normal operation.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record for the Cessna 152 from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Airport occurrence during taxi (to runway) defining event
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during taxi

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Monitoring other aircraft › Pilot of other aircraft
  • cause Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Aircraft › Effect on operation
  • factor Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Attention › Pilot of other aircraft

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 91 hours in all; 83 in this make and model; 53 in the last 90 days; 32 in the last 30 days; 29 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: May 22, 2019
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 14,851.7 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, May 6, 2019
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,669 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-235-L2C (piston); 13,632 hours total
  • Operator: Us Aviation Group Llc

The flight

  • Departed from: GVT Greenville TX at 8:30 pm
  • Destination: GYI Sherman/Denison TX
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 9,500 ft; scat at 6,000 ft
  • Temperature: 77°F (25°C), dew point 55°F (13°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.06 inHg
  • Observation at 9:55 pm from KGVT

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

The factual record for the Cessna 152 from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Airport occurrence during taxi defining event
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during taxi

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Monitoring other aircraft › Pilot
  • cause Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Aircraft › Effect on operation
  • factor Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Attention › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 79.5 hours in all; 73.5 in this make and model; 40.4 in the last 90 days; 17.2 in the last 30 days
  • Last flight review: May 24, 2019
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 17,993.9 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,669 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-235-L2C (piston); 0 hours total
  • Operator: U S Aviation Group Llc

The flight

  • Departed from: GVT Greenville TX at 8:30 pm
  • Destination: GYI Sherman/Denison TX
  • Flight plan: none

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.