The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB GAA18CA288 · Final report

Diamond Aircraft Ind INC DA 40 accident near Marlborough, Massachusetts, May 20, 2018

On May 20, 2018 at about 5:15 pm local time, a 2006 Diamond Aircraft Ind INC DA 40, registered N143RD, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing (landing roll) near Marlborough, Massachusetts (Marlboro airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 4 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s improper decision to land on a runway that was too short for a safe landing and his subsequent failure to maintain directional control in tailwind conditions.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
May 20, 2018 · about 5:15 pm local time
Place
Marlborough, Massachusetts · Marlboro · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 4 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Diamond Aircraft Ind INC DA 40 UNDESIGNAT, built 2006
Registration
N143RD · no longer on the register · serial 40.657
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported that, during landing, the airplane touched down in the first third of the 1,659-ft-long runway, but the airplane did not seem to slow as normal with the brakes applied. He pumped the brakes, but the deceleration was "less than expected." He considered performing a go around but decided to use maximum braking instead. With maximum braking applied, the airplane veered off the runway to the right and impacted a fence. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the left wing. The pilot reported that there were no preaccident mechanical failures or malfunctions with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation. He further reported that, following the accident, he inspected the runway and found solid skid marks from the right tire and broken skid marks from the left tire. The pilot reported that, about the time of the accident, the wind was light and variable and predominately from 280°. The automated weather observation station located about 12 miles east of the accident airport reported that, about 19 minutes before the accident, the wind was from 220° at 12 knots. The airplane landed on runway 32. The calculated landing roll with full flaps was 930 ft, and the landing distance over a 50-ft obstacle was 2,020 ft. The manufacturer stated that "For a safe landing the landing distance available (LDA) should be at least equal to the landing distance of a 50 ft (15m) obstacle."

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control on ground during landing (landing roll) defining event
  2. Runway excursion during landing (landing roll)
  3. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during landing (landing roll)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Directional control › Not attained/maintained
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › Tailwind › Effect on operation
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Surface speed/braking › Not attained/maintained
  • Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Fence/fence post › Contributed to outcome

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, flight instructor, commercial pilot, flight engineer
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 15,129 hours in all; 165 in this make and model; 48 in the last 90 days; 14 in the last 30 days; 2,979 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: September 9, 2017
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (waiver time limited special)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 2,176.1 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, December 18, 2017
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,646 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming IO-360-M1A (piston); 2,176 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: FWN Sussex NJ at 4:15 pm
  • Destination: 9B1 Marlborough MA
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • Runway 32, 1,659 ft by 45 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 220° at 12 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 3,400 ft
  • Temperature: 77°F (25°C), dew point 64°F (18°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.82 inHg
  • Observation at 4:56 pm from KBED, 12 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers3

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

4 documents, released by the NTSB on August 2, 2018. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.