The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB GAA17CA556 · Final report

Cessna 172 accident near Gallatin, Tennessee, September 16, 2017

On September 16, 2017 at about 6:20 pm local time, a 1974 Cessna 172, registered N5146R, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing near Gallatin, Tennessee (Sumner County Rgnl airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The student pilot’s improper landing flare, which resulted in a bounced landing.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
September 16, 2017 · about 6:20 pm local time
Place
Gallatin, Tennessee · Sumner County Rgnl · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 172 M, built 1974 · all 172s on the register
Registration
N5146R · no longer on the register · serial 17263383
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The student pilot reported that, while attempting a touch-and-go landing, the airplane bounced. He added that he "worked the yoke" to stabilize the airplane, but the airplane bounced a second time and veered off the runway to the left. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the firewall. The student pilot reported that there were no preaccident mechanical failures or malfunctions with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Abnormal runway contact during landing defining event
  2. Loss of control in flight during landing
  3. Attempted remediation/recovery during landing
  4. Runway excursion during landing

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Landing flare › Not attained/maintained
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Student/instructed pilot

Dual student

  • Certificate: student
  • Flight time: 142 hours in all; 141 in this make and model; 15 in the last 90 days; 8 in the last 30 days; 15 as pilot in command
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 8,953.5 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, July 23, 2017
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,300 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-320-E2D (piston); 4,149 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: BNA Nashville TN at 5:45 pm
  • Destination: M33 Gallatin TN
  • Flight plan: VFR
  • Runway 17, 6,300 ft by 100 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 070° at 4 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 5,500 ft; a few clouds at 3,600 ft
  • Temperature: 82°F (28°C), dew point 66°F (19°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.13 inHg
  • Observation at 5:53 pm from KBNA, 20 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

2 documents, released by the NTSB on November 16, 2017. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.