The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB GAA16CA149 · Final report

American AA 1 accident near Brigham City, Utah, March 12, 2016

On March 12, 2016 at about 9:30 pm local time, a 1969 American AA 1, registered N5703L, was substantially damaged in an accident during takeoff near Brigham City, Utah (Brigham City airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

Loss of directional control during landing, due to nose landing gear damage sustained in the prior takeoff, resulting in a runway excursion and nose over.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
March 12, 2016 · about 9:30 pm local time
Place
Brigham City, Utah · Brigham City · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person had minor injuries.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
American AA 1 UNDESIGNAT, built 1969 · all AA 1s on the register
Registration
N5703L · no longer on the register · serial AA1-0103
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported that during the takeoff roll about 60 knots with a "slight" crosswind, he "felt an abrupt" turn to the right, heard a "huge steady scrape" sound, and noted a vibration. Airborne at 65 knots, he reported a strong gust of wind from the left which felt like a quartering tail wind. He reported that he did not believe he had touched back down on the runway after becoming airborne. The pilot then flew the airplane over the airport where a local pilot on the ground reported to him that the nose landing gear was bent. During the subsequent landing, he reported that he made a soft field type of landing with the main landing gear touching down first. He held the nose landing gear off the ground as long as possible but when the nose landing gear touched down, he had no directional control and he heard a scraping noise. The airplane departed the runway to the right into a ditch and nosed over. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the fuselage, left wing, and vertical stabilizer. The pilot reported that he took off on runway 17 about 1410. The weather observation facility at the accident airport reported that from 1355 to 1415, the wind velocity varied from 13 knots to 15 knots with occasional gusts to 19 knots, and the wind direction varied from 190 to 240 degrees. According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Type Certificate Data Sheet, the maximum demonstrated crosswind component for the airplane is 15 miles per hour (13.03 knots). The FAA has published the Airplane Flying Handbook FAA-H-8083-3A (2004). This handbook discusses operations in crosswind conditions and states in part: Takeoffs and landings in certain crosswind conditions are inadvisable or even dangerous. If the crosswind is great enough to warrant an extreme drift correction, a hazardous landing condition may result. Therefore, the takeoff and landing capabilities with respect to the reported surface wind conditions and the available landing directions must be considered. It is imperative that pilots determine the maximum crosswind component of each airplane they fly, and avoid operations in wind conditions that exceed the capability of the airplane.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Other weather encounter during takeoff
  2. Collision during takeoff/land during takeoff defining event
  3. Loss of control on ground during landing (landing roll)
  4. Runway excursion during landing (landing roll)
  5. Nose over/nose down during landing (landing roll)
  6. Collision during takeoff/land during landing (landing roll)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Directional control › Attain/maintain not possible
  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Landing gear system › Nose/tail landing gear › Damaged/degraded

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 308 hours in all; 66 in this make and model; 205 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: June 22, 2015
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: minor injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 3,747.1 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, June 17, 2015
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,500 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-235 Series (piston); 2,118 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: BMC Brigham City UT at 9:00 pm
  • Destination: BMC Brigham City UT
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 17, 8,900 ft by 100 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 230° at 12 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 9,000 ft
  • Temperature: 59°F (15°C), dew point 36°F (2°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.84 inHg
  • Observation at 9:30 pm from KBMC

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

3 documents, released by the NTSB on May 25, 2016. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.