Amateur-built HP 14 accident near Jackson, New Hampshire, October 14, 2015
On October 14, 2015 at about 5:30 pm local time, a 1985 amateur-built HP 14 (glider), registered N102MW, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (descent) near Jackson, New Hampshire. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The glider pilot's decision to descend into a broken to overcast cloud layer, which resulted in encountering instrument meteorological conditions and the pilot parachuting from the glider. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's lack of planning for an alternate airport.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- October 14, 2015 · about 5:30 pm local time
- Place
- Jackson, New Hampshire · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
- Weather
- instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
- Aircraft
- Amateur-built HP 14 NO SERIES, built 1985
- Registration
- N102MW · no longer on the register · serial 44
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
During a local flight, the pilot of the glider reported that he found a hole to climb above a cloud layer and rode mountain wave updrafts to 17,500 feet mean sea level (MSL). While cruising at 17,500 feet, the pilot observed multiple holes in the cloud layer below and could see the "entire east behind me was still open." About 20 to 25 minutes later, the pilot began hearing reports over the radio that "precipitation was moving in" and the "cloud deck was thickening" at the departure airport. The pilot decided to dive for the "the last two remaining holes" in the cloud layer, but during the descent his "primary window" closed and he continued south to the last remaining window. While flying in this window, the pilot reported that he was unable to maintain altitude and then was unable to maintain visual meteorological conditions due to the increasing cloud layers. The pilot descended about 2,000 feet while in instrument meteorological conditions for about two minutes and did not see "any sign of the cloud base." About 6,400 feet MSL (2,200 feet above ground level), the pilot decided that his "safest option" remaining was to "bailout." Subsequently, the pilot placed his right hand on his parachute "D ring" and then "jumped, arched, and pulled." The parachute opened and the pilot landed safely in the tree canopy below, and the glider continued flying for a few miles and impacted trees. The canopy and left wing sustained substantial damage. The pilot stated there were no mechanical malfunctions or failures with the glider that would have precluded normal operation. About 5 hours before takeoff, a terminal aerodrome forecast issued for an airport about 12 nautical miles northwest of the glider's flight path, called for a ceiling of 3,500 feet overcast during the glider's flight. About the time of the accident, 18 nautical miles southeast of the glider's flight path an automated surface observing system reported a cloud layer of 4,900 feet few and 5,500 feet few.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Loss of visual reference during enroute (descent) defining event
The NTSB's findings
- cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
- factor Personnel issues › Task performance › Planning/preparation › Flight planning/navigation › Pilot
- Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Clouds › Decision related to condition
Pilot
- Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot, private
- Ratings: instructor: glider; rotorcraft: glider
- Flight time: 267 hours in all; 47 in this make and model; 20 in the last 90 days; 10 in the last 30 days; 240 as pilot in command; 200 on instruments
- Last flight review: October 20, 2013
- Medical certificate: None
- Seat: sngl
- Injury: no injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 140 hours
- Last inspection: condition inspection, May 20, 2015
- Maximum gross weight: 770 lb
- Seats: 1
- Landing gear: retractable
The flight
- Departed from: 2G8 Gorham NH at 4:30 pm
- Destination: 2G8 Gorham NH
- Flight plan: none
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 290° at 7 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: broken clouds at 1,200 ft
- Temperature: 54°F (12°C), dew point 48°F (9°C)
- Altimeter: 29.62 inHg
- Observation at 5:25 pm from KHIE, 15 miles away
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
5 documents, released by the NTSB on December 14, 2015. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 | PDF, 9 pages | View Download |
| 2 | Written Statement (Pilot in Command) | PDF, 3 pages | View Download |
| 3 | Flight Path (Data Courtesy of Operator) | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 4 | Weather Information | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 5 | Docket Photos (Courtesy of Operator) | PDF, 3 pages | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
