The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB GAA15CA042 · Final report

Cessna 140 accident near Mize, Mississippi, April 18, 2015

On April 18, 2015 at about 11:45 pm local time, a 1946 Cessna 140, registered N76452, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing (landing roll) near Mize, Mississippi. It was a flight of an unrecorded kind under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's failure to maintain clearance from obstacles during an off airport precautionary landing roll.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
April 18, 2015 · about 11:45 pm local time
Place
Mize, Mississippi · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person had minor injuries.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 140 G, built 1946 · all 140s on the register
Registration
N76452 · no longer on the register · serial 10884
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Flight of an unrecorded kind · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) reported that the pilot made an emergency landing on a highway due to weather conditions.  The FAA stated that during the landing roll, the airplane struck a highway sign, flipped upside down, and sustained substantial damage to the fuselage. It is unknown if there were any pre-impact mechanical failures or malfunctions with the airframe or engine that would have precluded normal operation.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Other weather encounter during enroute (cruise)
  2. Off-field or emergency landing during landing
  3. Loss of control on ground during landing (landing roll)
  4. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during landing (landing roll)
  5. Nose over/nose down during landing (landing roll) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Monitoring environment › Pilot
  • cause Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Sign/marker › Awareness of condition
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Altitude › Not attained/maintained

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Medical certificate: Unknown
  • Seat: frt
  • Injury: minor injuries

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: inspection type not recorded
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,601 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Cont Motor C85 SERIES (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Flight plan: not recorded

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Visibility: 8 statute miles
  • Sky: a few clouds at 200 ft
  • Temperature: 72°F (22°C), dew point 0°F (-18°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.85 inHg
  • Observation at 11:35 pm from KPIB, 27 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

4 documents, released by the NTSB on June 29, 2015. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.