The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily · Carbon Free Flight by 2050
Accidents · NTSB ERA25LA142 · Final report

Cessna TU206G accident near Wedgefield, Florida, March 12, 2025

On March 12, 2025 at about 6:50 pm local time, a 1977 Cessna TU206G, registered N27GP, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute near Wedgefield, Florida. It was an aerial observation flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

Preview. This page is not yet listed for search engines.

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

A total loss of engine power as a result of an excessively rich fuel-to-air ratio due to the pilot’s failure to properly lean the engine’s fuel air mixture and the inadvertent activation of the auxiliary fuel pump.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
March 12, 2025 · about 6:50 pm local time
Place
Wedgefield, Florida · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna TU206G, built 1977 · all TU206Gs on the register
Registration
N27GP · registry record · serial U20604105
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Aerial observation flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported that he was flying to the surveying location about 1,800 ft mean sea level (msl) for about 10 minutes after departing when the engine “just stopped.” He stated that there were no indications of an engine problem until it suddenly lost total power. He switched the fuel tanks and verified the magneto switch position, but the engine did not regain power. He attempted a forced landing in a field but, as the airplane touched down, the left wing contacted trees and stopped the airplane abruptly. The left wing was substantially damaged, and fuel began to leak into the cabin. The pilot and pilot-rated passenger exited through the aft door and called the departure airport’s air traffic control tower for assistance. Postaccident examination and an engine test run revealed no evidence of any preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. Data recovered from the engine data monitoring device installed in the airplane showed that the engine consumed about 10 gallons per hour (gph) more fuel than indicated by the calculations in the Pilot’s Operating Handbook (POH) when the airplane was at a cruise altitude of 1,700 ft mean sea level (msl). The fuel flow increased above that previously established level just before the engine stopped producing power. With the data showing a high fuel flow spike just before the loss of engine power, and the pilot indicating that the mixture lever had been set to the full rich position since takeoff, the spike was likely the result of the higher-than-recommended mixture setting and inadvertent activation of the airplane’s auxiliary fuel pump, which enrichened the fuel-to-air mixture past the point of the engine’s combustion capability. This condition was the subject of a note in the airplane’s POH.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Fuel related during enroute defining event
  2. Off-field or emergency landing during emergency descent

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of equip/system › Pilot
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Powerplant parameters › Not attained/maintained

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 15,977 hours in all; 622 in this make and model; 71 in the last 90 days; 38 in the last 30 days; 15,751 as pilot in command; 3,854 on instruments
  • Last flight review: May 17, 2024
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

Pilot-Rated Passenger

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Last flight review: May 20, 2025
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 13,832.3 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, November 13, 2024
  • Maximum gross weight: 3,600 lb
  • Seats: 3
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Continental Aerospace Technolo TSIO-520-M7B (piston); 0 hours total
  • Operator: Gpi Geospatial INC

The flight

  • Departed from: ORL Orlando FL at 6:40 pm
  • Flight plan: none
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 79°F (26°C), dew point 43°F (6°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.02 inHg
  • Observation at 2:53 pm from MCO, 13 miles away

Weather report (METAR): KMCO 121853Z 00000KT 10SM CLR 26/06 A3002 RMK AO2 SLP164 T02560061

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

15 documents, released by the NTSB on March 18, 2026. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Other NTSB records under N27GP the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

1982-07-14LAX82FA255 · accident near Schellville, CA · destroyed · minor injuries

About this page

Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, the folder of records gathered during the investigation, shown as the NTSB released them (the NTSB redacts some personal details first) and listed under the NTSB's own titles. This site's own text never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number ERA25LA142.