The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA18TA263 · Final report

Amateur-built CH 750 accident near Deleon Springs, Florida, September 23, 2018

On September 23, 2018 at about 7:45 pm local time, a 2012 amateur-built CH 750, registered N752VK, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Deleon Springs, Florida. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's operation of the airplane with the alternator switch in the off position, which allowed the selected battery to discharge and resulted in an ignition system failure and a total loss of engine power.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
September 23, 2018 · about 7:45 pm local time
Place
Deleon Springs, Florida · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people had minor injuries.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Amateur-built CH 750, built 2012
Registration
N752VK · no longer on the register · serial 75-8435
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The private pilot/owner of the experimental, amateur-built airplane reported that, about 15 minutes into the local flight, the engine started "skipping" before completely losing power. He then set up for a forced landing to an open area. During the descent, he maneuvered to clear power lines. The airplane touched down at a steep descent angle, nosed over, and came to rest inverted, which resulted in substantial damage to the airframe. The airplane's engine used an electronic control unit instead of magnetos and required at least one of the airplane's two onboard batteries to provide electrical energy to the ignition system for the engine to operate. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed that both of its batteries were discharged. After the batteries were charged, the engine was started and ran normally. The alternator also charged the batteries normally. The cockpit instrument panel switch that enabled the alternator to supply energy to the airplane's electrical system, and thus charge the airplane's batteries, was unlabeled. When the switch was placed in the unlabeled on position, the alternator field wire received power and the alternator charged normally. The pilot reported that he may have inadvertently left it in the off position during the flight. With the switch in this position, the engine would have continued to run until the selected battery lost its charge. The pilot also reported that he did not use a checklist when operating the airplane. It is likely that the pilot failed to activate the airplane's alternator, which resulted in a discharge of the selected battery during the 15-minute flight. The subsequent loss of electrical power eventually resulted in the total loss of engine power. Additionally, the airplane was not equipped with an alternator warning light as recommended by the engine manufacturer. Had the airplane been equipped with such a light, the pilot might have realized that he had failed to turn the alternator on and that it was not providing energy to the electrical system to sustain the charge of the selected battery.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of engine power (total) during enroute (cruise) defining event
  2. Off-field or emergency landing during emergency descent
  3. Nose over/nose down during landing (landing roll)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Electrical power system › AC generator › alternator › Not used/operated
  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Forgotten action/omission › Pilot
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of checklist › Pilot
  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Electrical power system › DC indicating system › Design

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 237 hours in all; 7 in the last 90 days; 2 in the last 30 days; 195 as pilot in command
  • Medical certificate: Sport Pilot
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: minor injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 701 hours
  • Last inspection: condition inspection, October 21, 2017; 55 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,325 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Viking 110 (piston); 26 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: DED Deland FL at 7:30 pm
  • Destination: DED Deland FL
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 090° at 7 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 88°F (31°C), dew point 70°F (21°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.97 inHg
  • Observation at 7:15 pm from KDED, 6 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

8 documents, released by the NTSB on February 19, 2019. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.