Bellanca 7ECA accident near Warsaw, Kentucky, June 3, 2018
On June 3, 2018 at about 1:45 pm local time, a 1973 Bellanca 7ECA, registered N8698, was substantially damaged in an accident during takeoff (rejected takeoff) near Warsaw, Kentucky (Private Unnamed Airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The pilot’s inadequate preflight performance planning, and his delayed decision to abort the takeoff, which resulted in a ground loop.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- June 3, 2018 · about 1:45 pm local time
- Place
- Warsaw, Kentucky · Private Unnamed Airport · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Bellanca 7ECA NO SERIES, built 1973 · all 7ECAs on the register
- Registration
- N8698 · no longer on the register · serial 922-73
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
After a preflight inspection and engine run up revealed no anomalies, the pilot attempted to takeoff from an upsloping turf runway. The initial takeoff roll was normal; however, as the airplane reached 60 knots, the pilot determined that the airplane’s acceleration was not "normal" and that the airplane would not clear the trees at the end of the runway, nor be able to stop within the remaining runway. The pilot then rejected the takeoff, applied full rudder, and the airplane ground looped, resulting in substantial damage to the fuselage. A cursory examination of the engine did not reveal any preimpact mechanical anomalies that would have precluded normal operation; however, the examination did not determine whether the engine was capable of developing its full rated power during the accident takeoff. The runway measured 1,100 ft by 125 ft and had an approximate 3% slope. The calculated density altitude at the time of the accident was about 2,389 ft, and the wind reported at the nearest weather observation facility would have provided a headwind component of about 3 knots for the takeoff runway. According to the pilot’s operating handbook, at maximum gross weight, the airplane would have required about 938 ft to clear a 50-ft obstacle, given the wind conditions and a dry, level grass runway; however, the actual distance required would have been greater than the calculated 938 ft due to the upsloping runway. It is likely that the reduced acceleration noticed by the pilot was the result of decreased engine performance due to the density altitude combined with the upsloping runway, both of which would have increased the runway distance required to reach takeoff speed. It is also likely that even with full engine power, given the conditions on the day of the accident, the runway distance required would have been close to or exceeded the runway length available. Although the pilot acted appropriately by aborting the takeoff upon realizing that the airplane would not clear the trees at the end of the runway, his delayed decision to abort resulted in insufficient runway remaining on which to slow and stop the airplane.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Loss of control on ground during takeoff (rejected takeoff)
- Preflight or dispatch event during prior to flight
- Abrupt maneuver during takeoff (rejected takeoff) defining event
The NTSB's findings
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Planning/preparation › Performance calculations › Pilot
- Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
- Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Directional control › Not specified
Pilot
- Certificate: airline transport pilot
- Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 14,500 hours in all; 250 in this make and model; 5 in the last 90 days; 5 in the last 30 days; 12,000 as pilot in command
- Last flight review: November 16, 2017
- Medical certificate: BasicMed
- Seat: frt
- Injury: no injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 1,273 hours
- Last inspection: annual inspection, May 5, 2018; 4 hours since
- Maximum gross weight: 1,650 lb
- Seats: 2
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Lycoming O-235-C1 (piston); 1,273 hours total
The flight
- Flight plan: none
- Runway none, 1,100 ft by 125 ft
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 290° at 12 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: broken clouds at 4,500 ft; scat at 1,400 ft
- Temperature: 75°F (24°C), dew point 68°F (20°C)
- Altimeter: 29.86 inHg
- Observation at 1:52 pm from CVG, 16 miles away
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
6 documents, released by the NTSB on May 12, 2021. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 | PDF, 9 pages | View Download |
| 2 | Record of Conversation - FAA Inspector | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 3 | Takeoff Performance Calculations and Data | PDF, 6 pages | View Download |
| 4 | Maintenance Records Excerpts | PDF, 3 pages | View Download |
| 5 | Weather Reports and Records | PDF, 6 pages | View Download |
| 6 | Photos | PDF, 5 pages | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
