Costruzioni Aeronautiche Tecna P2008 accident near Burgaw, North Carolina, April 16, 2016
On April 16, 2016 at about 8:50 pm local time, a 2014 Costruzioni Aeronautiche Tecna P2008, registered N588TA, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Burgaw, North Carolina. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The pilot’s failure to activate the airplane’s alternator, which resulted in an eventual loss of electrical power to the engine’s fuel pumps, fuel starvation, and a total loss of engine power. Contributing was the pilot’s use of an incomplete checklist.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- April 16, 2016 · about 8:50 pm local time
- Place
- Burgaw, North Carolina · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 1 person had minor injuries.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Costruzioni Aeronautiche Tecna P2008, built 2014 · all P2008s on the register
- Registration
- N588TA · registry record · serial 088
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The airplane was in cruise flight when, according to the pilot, the electronic flight display system "went out." About 10 minutes later, the engine sputtered and lost power. The pilot switched fuel tanks and attempted to restart the engine unsuccessfully then made a forced landing to a field. During the landing rollout, the airplane's nose landing gear struck a ditch and it nosed over, resulting in substantial damage to the wings, vertical stabilizer, and rudder. Review of recorded data from the airplane’s instrument panel-mounted display system indicated that electrical bus voltage started at 12.6 volts when the system was powered on, decreased for the entirety of the recording, decreasing more rapidly near the end of the flight. The alternator electrical current was zero for the entire recording. Postaccident examination and testing of the airplane’s electrical system revealed that the system was functioning normally; all cautions and warnings, including the “ALT OUT” message, were displayed by the system as required. Additionally, testing of the airplane’s engine and fuel pumps showed they also operated normally. Given this information, it is likely that for the entirety of the accident flight, electrical power was being supplied by the airplane’s battery alone and was not being replenished by the alternator. While the airplane was equipped with two fuel pumps, both required electrical power for operation. One fuel pump was likely not operating at all for the flight, as it required electrical power solely from the alternator for operation. The remaining fuel pump, which was powered by the battery, likely ceased operation as the battery voltage decreased to a level below that required to sustain it. With both fuel pumps offline, the engine was subsequently starved of fuel, and lost total power. An abbreviated, 6-page checklist was found in the accident airplane. Comparison of the checklist to the published flight manual revealed differences from the Normal Procedures section in the flight manual, including no mention of checking the position of the alternator side of the split master switch on the checklist. It is likely that as the pilot began the flight, he did not activate the airplane’s alternator, nor did he notice the warning messages and voltage highlights that were called out by the airplane’s electronic flight display system during the flight that would have warned him of this omission.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Loss of engine power (total) during enroute (cruise) defining event
- Off-field or emergency landing during emergency descent
- Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during landing (landing roll)
- Nose over/nose down during landing (landing roll)
- Preflight or dispatch event during standing (engine(s) not oper)
The NTSB's findings
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of checklist › Pilot
- Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Electrical power system › Alternator › generator drive sys › Not used/operated
- Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Fuel system › Fuel pumps › Inoperative
- Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Electrical power system › Battery/charger › Capability exceeded
Pilot
- Certificate: sport pilot
- Ratings: single-engine land
- Flight time: 352 hours in all; 30 in this make and model; 15 in the last 90 days; 10 in the last 30 days; 200 as pilot in command
- Last flight review: March 9, 2016
- Medical certificate: Sport Pilot
- Seat: left
- Injury: minor injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 41.1 hours
- Last inspection: condition inspection, February 15, 2016
- Maximum gross weight: 1,320 lb
- Seats: 2
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Rotax 914UL2 (piston); 50 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: ACZ Wallace NC at 8:37 pm
- Destination: SUT Oak Island NC
- Flight plan: none
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 040° at 14 knots, gusting 21
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: clear
- Temperature: 70°F (21°C), dew point 34°F (1°C)
- Altimeter: 30.32 inHg
- Observation at 5:53 pm from ILM, 16 miles away
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
