The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA16LA015 · Final report

Bell 206L 3 accident near Dickinson, Alabama, October 15, 2015

On October 15, 2015 at about 8:00 pm local time, a 1992 Bell 206L 3 (helicopter), registered N206CJ, was substantially damaged in an accident during maneuvering (low-alt flying) near Dickinson, Alabama. It was an aerial application (crop spraying) flight under agricultural flying rules (Part 137). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The improper installation by company maintenance personnel of the securing hardware of a tail rotor driveshaft section, which resulted in that section of tail rotor driveshaft disconnecting and a complete loss of tail rotor thrust.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
October 15, 2015 · about 8:00 pm local time
Place
Dickinson, Alabama · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Bell 206L 3, built 1992 · all 206L 3s on the register
Registration
N206CJ · registry record · serial 51579
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Aerial application (crop spraying) flight · agricultural flying rules (Part 137)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

During an aerial application flight, the helicopter was flying between 70 and 120 ft above trees, and the pilot heard a "pop" sound followed by an immediate loss of tail rotor thrust. He lowered collective and descended into trees, and the helicopter came to rest on its left side. Examination of the helicopter determined that the loss of tail rotor thrust was precipitated by a disconnect in the tail rotor drive system. A self-locking nut securing one of the two bolts that attached the aft end of the first tail rotor driveshaft (shaft S1) aft of the oil cooler blower to the disc pack coupling was missing. The nut and the bolt that it secured were not recovered at the accident site. The separated hardware allowed misalignment of the driveshaft with the axis of rotation, which led to the fracture of shaft S1 and of the second tail rotor driveshaft (shaft S2) aft of the oil cooler blower. The prevailing or tare torque on two out of the remaining three self-locking nuts securing the forward and aft ends of shaft S1 to the disc pack couplings were below the minimum torque specified in the helicopter manufacturer's standard practices manual. The prevailing torque is a measure of the turning resistance of a lock nut, and the turning resistance generally decreases as nuts are reused. About 490 hours earlier, the operator had performed a modification to the helicopter that required in part, removal of shaft S1 and the tailboom assembly. Since this modification, the helicopter had been subjected to four 100-hour inspections. Three lots of defective nuts of the type used to secure components of the tail rotor drive system had been identified; however, the operator could not determine whether they had previously had any of the suspect nuts in stock. Although the possibility of a defective nut resulting in the driveshaft disconnect could not be eliminated, given the insufficient prevailing torque on 2 of the remaining 3 self-locking nuts securing shaft S1 to the disc pack couplings, it is more likely that the separated nut also had insufficient prevailing torque. And it was that insufficient prevailing torque of the missing self-locking nut that had been removed and improperly re-installed by the operator's maintenance personnel, which allowed the self-locking nut to back-off. This accident and six previous accidents involving the same make and model of helicopter illustrate an in-service issue with hardware used to secure the tail rotor driveshafts. As a result of these accidents, Transport Canada issued a safety alert notifying maintenance personnel of the need to check the prevailing or tare torque of hardware securing the tail rotor drive system.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Flight control sys malf/fail during maneuvering (low-alt flying) defining event
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during emergency descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft propeller/rotor › Tail rotor drive system › Tail rotor drive shaft › Malfunction
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft propeller/rotor › Tail rotor drive system › Tail rotor drive shaft › Incorrect service/maintenance
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Maintenance › Replacement › Maintenance personnel

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; single-engine sea; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: helicopter; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Flight time: 18,000 hours in all; 1,500 in this make and model; 400 in the last 90 days; 100 in the last 30 days; 18,000 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: June 1, 2015
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 6,550 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, September 10, 2015; 94 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 4,150 lb
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Allison 250-C20 SER (turboshaft); 0 hours total
  • Operator: Couch Helicopter Services, Inc.

The flight

  • Departed from: Dickinson AL at 7:55 pm
  • Destination: Dickinson AL
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: at 3 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 88°F (31°C), dew point 50°F (10°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.07 inHg
  • Observation at 7:53 pm from GZH, 39 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.