Piper PA44 accident near Houlton, Maine, August 27, 2015
On August 27, 2015 at about 6:00 am local time, a 1980 Piper PA44, registered N553MD, was destroyed in an accident during approach (IFR final approach) near Houlton, Maine (Houlton Intl airport). It was a business flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The pilot's descent below the published minimum descent altitude in night instrument meteorological conditions without visual contact with the runway environment, which resulted in a collision with trees and terrain short of the runway. Contributing to the accident were the pilot's acute fatigue and his decision to attempt an instrument approach procedure that was not authorized at night.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- August 27, 2015 · about 6:00 am local time
- Place
- Houlton, Maine · Houlton Intl · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 1 person was killed.
- Weather
- instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
- Aircraft
- Piper PA44 180, built 1980 · all PA44s on the register
- Registration
- N553MD · no longer on the register · serial 44-8095021
- Damage
- Destroyed
- Flight
- Business flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The airline transport pilot was ferrying the airplane across the Atlantic Ocean. The accident occurred as the pilot was completing the third leg of the trip and was conducting an instrument approach in dark night instrument meteorological conditions. Radar data indicated that the pilot conducted the entire approach at altitudes 300 ft to 700 ft lower than the instrument approach procedure authorized. Track data recovered from an onboard GPS unit depicted the airplane making "S" turns back and forth across the final approach course and ended to the right of the extended runway centerline in the vicinity of the accident site. The airplane collided with trees and terrain about 2.5 nautical miles short of the runway. The wreckage distribution was consistent with controlled flight into the terrain, and postaccident examination revealed no evidence of any preexisting mechanical anomalies that would have precluded normal operation of the airplane. The reported 300-ft ceiling at the time of the accident was well below the approach's published 700-ft ceiling minimum for planning purposes, and the approach was not authorized at night. It is likely that the pilot continued to descend below the published minimum descent altitude without establishing visual contact with the runway environment rather than conducting a missed approach. The trip originated 21.6 hours before the accident occurred and included 16.6 hours of flight time and a 3.8-hour ground delay that may have allowed time for the pilot to sleep. Even if the pilot napped during the ground delay, it is unlikely that the sleep would have been fully restorative. Additionally, assuming the time required to wake, travel to the airport, and complete preflight inspections and planning before beginning the trip's first leg, the pilot's duty day could easily have reached or exceeded 24 hours. The total amount of flight time relative to the time available for rest strongly suggests that, during the instrument approach, the pilot was likely experiencing the effects of acute fatigue, which degraded his performance, including his handling of the airplane and his decision-making.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Controlled flight into terrain or object (CFIT) during approach (IFR final approach) defining event
The NTSB's findings
- cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Altitude › Not attained/maintained
- cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
- factor Personnel issues › Physical › Alertness/Fatigue › Lack of sleep › Pilot
- factor Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
- Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Low ceiling › Not specified
- Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Light condition › Dark › Not specified
Pilot
- Certificate: airline transport pilot
- Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 3,000 hours in all; 100 in this make and model; 15 in the last 90 days
- Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
- Seat: left
- Injury: fatal
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 4,766.6 hours
- Last inspection: inspection type not recorded
- Maximum gross weight: 3,801 lb
- Landing gear: retractable
- Engine 1: Lycoming O-360 (piston); 0 hours total
- Engine 2: Lycoming O-360 (piston); 0 hours total
- Operator: Growl INC
The flight
- Departed from: CYYR Goose Bay at 1:15 am
- Destination: HUL Houlton ME
- Flight plan: IFR
- Runway 05, 5,015 ft by 100 ft
Weather at the time
- Light: night, dark
- Wind: from 230° at 3 knots
- Visibility: 1.8 statute miles
- Sky: overcast at 300 ft
- Temperature: 64°F (18°C), dew point 63°F (17°C)
- Altimeter: 29.87 inHg
- Observation at 6:17 am from HUL, 1 miles away
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
9 documents, released by the NTSB on November 10, 2016. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Air Traffic Control Factual Report | PDF, 7 pages | View Download |
| 2 | Air Traffic Control Zbw Facility Log | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 3 | Approach Procedure | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 4 | Witness Statement | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 5 | Reports from Parties to the Investigation | PDF, 12 pages | View Download |
| 6 | Toxicological Report | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 7 | Statement of Party Representatives to NTSB Investigation | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 8 | Photos | PDF, 4 pages | View Download |
| 9 | Global Positioning System - Specialist's Factual Report | PDF, 7 pages | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
