The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA15CA048 · Final report

Cessna 177 accident near Landrum, South Carolina, November 8, 2014

On November 8, 2014 at about 9:00 pm local time, a 1967 Cessna 177, registered N3339T, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Landrum, South Carolina. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's improper preflight planning, which resulted in a loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
November 8, 2014 · about 9:00 pm local time
Place
Landrum, South Carolina · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 177, built 1967 · all 177s on the register
Registration
N3339T · registry record · serial 17700639
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

According to the pilot, while enroute on a cross country flight the engine began to "sputter" before experiencing a total loss of power. The pilot declared an emergency and performed a forced landing on a dirt road, resulting in substantial damage to the engine firewall. The pilot reported that his fuel calculation requirements for the flight were incorrect, and as a result of his miscalculation, the airplane ran out of fuel.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Fuel exhaustion during enroute (cruise) defining event
  2. Loss of engine power (total) during enroute (cruise)
  3. Off-field or emergency landing during emergency descent
  4. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during landing

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Planning/preparation › Fuel planning › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Fuel › Fluid level
  • Environmental issues › Physical environment › Terrain › Rough terrain › Contributed to outcome

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 352 hours in all; 336 in this make and model; 20 in the last 90 days; 20 in the last 30 days; 298 as pilot in command
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 3,434 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, November 26, 2013
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,350 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-360-A4M (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: VLL Troy MI at 4:30 pm
  • Destination: GMU Greenville SC
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 230° at 6 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 57°F (14°C), dew point 36°F (2°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.96 inHg
  • Observation at 8:53 pm from GMU, 13 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.