The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA14LA107 · Final report

Piper PA-34-200 accident near West Palm Beach, Florida, January 28, 2014

On January 28, 2014 at about 5:45 pm local time, a 1973 Piper PA-34-200, registered N16389, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing (landing roll) near West Palm Beach, Florida (Palm Beach Intl airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot/owner’s failure to maintain the airplane in accordance with a mandatory service bulletin and an airworthiness directive, which resulted in the nose landing gear collapse during landing.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
January 28, 2014 · about 5:45 pm local time
Place
West Palm Beach, Florida · Palm Beach Intl · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Piper PA-34-200, built 1973 · all PA-34-200s on the register
Registration
N16389 · no longer on the register · serial 34-7350138
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot/owner reported that, during the approach, he noted that the nose landing gear (NLG) indication light was not illuminated. He aborted the landing and chose to fly by the air traffic control tower to have a controller check the position of the landing gear. An air traffic controller reported that the landing gear appeared to be down. The airplane was then cleared to land, and, during the landing roll, the NLG collapsed, and the airplane came to rest on the runway. Postaccident examination revealed that there was a hydraulic leak above the NLG actuator and that the NLG drag links were not secured in accordance with the manufacturer's maintenance manual. Over 9 years before the accident, the manufacturer issued a mandatory service bulletin (SB) that required inspections of the NLG, including inspection of the NLG actuator mounting bracket for cracks, elongation of the holes where the retraction link attaches, and loose mounting rivets, and the lubrication of the NLG assembly at a frequency interval not to exceed 50 hours. Subsequently, the Federal Aviation Administration issued an airworthiness directive (AD) requiring the actions contained in the SB. The postaccident examination also revealed that a microswitch appeared to have recently been replaced; however, no associated maintenance entry was found during a review of the airplane's maintenance logbooks. The review did reveal that the airplane's most recent annual inspection was performed about 2 years and 300 flight hours before the accident, that the AD was complied with at that time, and that no defects were noted. No other entries regarding annual inspections or compliance with the SB or AD were noted. Therefore, it is likely that the airplane was not in compliance with the SB or AD at the time of the accident, which likely resulted in the NLG being unable to operate properly and in its collapsing on landing. If the airplane owner had maintained the airplane in accordance with the SB and AD, the hydraulic leak and the improperly secured NLG drag links could have been detected and corrected, which could have prevented the NLG collapse.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Sys/Comp malf/fail (non-power) during landing (landing roll)
  2. Landing gear collapse during landing (landing roll) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft handling/service › Maintenance/inspections › Scheduled maint checks › Not serviced/maintained
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft handling/service › Maintenance/inspections › Scheduled maint checks › Not inspected
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Maintenance › Scheduled/routine maintenance › Owner/builder
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Landing gear system › Nose/tail landing gear › Failure
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Landing gear system › Nose/tail landing gear › Failure
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Landing gear system › Nose/tail landing gear › Incorrect service/maintenance
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Record › keeping › Aircraft/maintenance logs › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: foreign licence, private
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 6,617.3 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, January 30, 2012
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: Lycoming IO-360-C1E6 (piston); 0 hours total
  • Engine 2: Lycoming LIO-360-C1E6 (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: MYAM Marsh Harbour at 4:30 pm
  • Destination: PBI West Palm Beach FL
  • Flight plan: VFR
  • Runway 10R, 3,213 ft by 75 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 160° at 8 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: scat at 3,300 ft
  • Temperature: 79°F (26°C), dew point 64°F (18°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.03 inHg
  • Observation at 5:53 pm from PBI

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.