The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA13IA313 · Final report

Bell Helicopter Textron Canada 206 incident near New York, New York, June 30, 2013

On June 30, 2013 at about 3:55 pm local time, a 2009 Bell Helicopter Textron Canada 206, registered N405MR, suffered minor damage in an incident during enroute (cruise) near New York, New York. It was an other work-use flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 5 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The improper maintenance decision to adjust the engine oil pressure regulator valve in response to high oil pressure indications rather than to properly troubleshoot the anomaly, which then allowed an existing oil supply path blockage to increase and led to the eventual insufficient lubrication of the compressor section No. 2 bearing and the subsequent loss of engine power. Contributing to the incident was an engine oil lubrication system anomaly of unknown origin.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
June 30, 2013 · about 3:55 pm local time
Place
New York, New York · map
Type
Incident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 5 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Bell Helicopter Textron Canada 206 L-4, built 2009 · all 206s on the register
Registration
N405MR · no longer on the register · serial 52391
Damage
Minor damage
Flight
Other work-use flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The commercial pilot reported that, during an overwater sightseeing flight in the single-engine helicopter and while at 1,500 ft, he heard a "bang," followed by the "engine out" warning. He then saw that the N2 (power turbine) indication was dropping. The pilot decided to perform an autorotation, and just before lowering the collective and rolling the throttle to flight idle, he saw the "engine chip" light illuminate. During the landing flare, the pilot deployed the skid-mounted floats, bled off all forward airspeed, and completed a successful autorotation. The turbine section of the turboshaft engine had recently been overhauled, and the engine had operated for about 2 hours before the incident. The No. 2 bearing in the compressor section and its corresponding races were found damaged and appeared dry with evidence of high-temperature exposure. The forward side of the bearing cage exhibited significantly more damage than the aft side; the forward side was deformed, and the bearing balls on that side appeared rough and had large areas of material loss. Metallurgical examination revealed thermal distress to the raceway surfaces consistent with the bearing operating with reduced oil flow. To confirm oil flow, the engine gearbox was attached to an oil supply, and the engine oil pump was rotated by a hand drill. Three of the four jets from the oil supply tube produced streams of oil; however, the fourth jet, which normally supplied oil to the aft face of the No. 2 bearing, did not. Visual examination of the oil supply tube revealed that a dark, thick substance was adhered to the face and chamfer. Analysis of the substance determined that, although it was the correct-specification turbine oil, it was thermally degraded. Initial flow tests revealed that the oil supply tube that lubricated the No. 2 bearing was operating below the total flow requirement. The tube was cleaned ultrasonically multiple times, and, with each subsequent cleaning, the amount of debris collected decreased. After the cleanings, the No. 2 bearing orifice met the flow requirement. Nearly the entire surface of the pressure oil screen, except for the area covered by an O-ring, was also covered in a thick, dark substance. A sample of the substance was also determined to be consistent with correct-specification but thermally degraded turbine oil. Additional components were also covered with coked and degraded turbine oil. In addition, the engine oil pressure regulator valve was found backed out, and the poppet guide was atypically close to the outer lip of the housing. The atypical position indicated that adjustments, which were not documented, were likely made in response to high oil pressure indications. However, any adjustment to the oil pressure regulator valve would have been contrary to the engine manufacturer's maintenance manual, which cautioned not to do so for high oil pressure, which would have been "cause to suspect other oil system problems have developed." The origin of the coking and buildup of degraded turbine oil within the supply system could not be determined; however, the extent to which the oil pressure regulator valve was found adjusted indicated that it had likely occurred over time, which in turn then masked a growing oil blockage problem within the oil lubrication supply paths.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of engine power (total) during enroute (cruise) defining event
  2. Off-field or emergency landing during emergency descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (turbine/turboprop) › Compressor section › Incorrect service/maintenance
  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Incorrect action performance › Maintenance personnel
  • factor Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (turbine/turboprop) › Oil system › Damaged/degraded
  • Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (turbine/turboprop) › Compressor section › Damaged/degraded

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: instructor: helicopter; instrument: helicopter; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Flight time: 1,884 hours in all; 763 in this make and model; 190 in the last 90 days; 73 in the last 30 days; 1,833 as pilot in command; 887 on instruments
  • Last flight review: September 13, 2012
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 2,536 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, June 28, 2013; 2 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 4,550 lb
  • Seats: 5
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Rolls-Royc 250-C30P (turboshaft); 0 hours total
  • Operator: New York Helicopter Charter INC

The flight

  • Departed from: JRB New York NY at 3:40 pm
  • Destination: JRB New York NY
  • Flight plan: VFR

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: at 6 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 3,400 ft; a few clouds at 2,300 ft
  • Temperature: 84°F (29°C), dew point 70°F (21°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.80 inHg
  • Observation at 3:51 pm from LGA, 5 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers4

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.