The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA12LA584 · Final report

Keuthan BUCCANEER II accident near Granite Quarry, North Carolina, September 30, 2012

On September 30, 2012 at about 9:55 pm local time, a Keuthan BUCCANEER II, registered N710WP, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Granite Quarry, North Carolina. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s inadequate preflight fuel planning, which resulted in a total loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
September 30, 2012 · about 9:55 pm local time
Place
Granite Quarry, North Carolina · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was killed.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Keuthan BUCCANEER II
Registration
N710WP · registry record · serial 001
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot added about 5 gallons of automotive gasoline to the aircraft fuel tank before departing on a local flight. Witnesses observed the amphibious airplane flying low, and the engine lost power. The airplane then struck power lines and crashed in an open field. Examination of the airframe and engine revealed no evidence of a pre-existing mechanical malfunction or failure. An aircraft recovery parachute was found partially deployed within the wreckage. An examination of the aircraft fuel lines revealed only a small amount of residual fuel. The fuel tank contained only residual fuel and was not breached.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Fuel exhaustion during enroute (cruise)
  2. Loss of engine power (total) during enroute (cruise) defining event
  3. Off-field or emergency landing during emergency descent
  4. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during emergency descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Fuel › Fluid management
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Planning/preparation › Fuel planning › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; single-engine sea
  • Flight time: 500 hours in all; 445 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: August 18, 2012
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: unk
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: inspection type not recorded
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,125 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Rotax 582DCDI (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: RUQ Salisbury NC at 8:55 pm
  • Destination: RUQ Salisbury NC
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 68°F (20°C), dew point 54°F (12°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.87 inHg
  • Observation at 9:55 pm from RUQ, 4 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.