The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA12FA438 · Final report

Cirrus Design CORP SR20 accident near Moscow, Tennessee, July 11, 2012

On July 11, 2012 at about 1:52 pm local time, a Cirrus Design CORP SR20, registered N764RV, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Moscow, Tennessee. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The non-instrument rated pilot’s decision to continue visual flight rules flight into instrument meteorological conditions, which resulted in his spatial disorientation, a loss of airplane control, and subsequent impact with trees and terrain.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
July 11, 2012 · about 1:52 pm local time
Place
Moscow, Tennessee · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was killed.
Weather
instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
Aircraft
Cirrus Design CORP SR20
Registration
N764RV · no longer on the register · serial 1687
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The non-instrument rated pilot departed the airport in instrument meteorological conditions with no flight plan filed for the personal flight. Prior to the flight, an employee at the departure airport who talked to the pilot reported that the pilot stated he was in a "hurry to depart due to possible bad weather in the area." A review of radar data indicated that a radar target identified as the accident airplane flew for about 25 minutes after takeoff at a relatively constant altitude of about 1,000 feet mean sea level (msl). Then, the radar target began to climb at 0849:55 with intermittent descents of one to two hundred feet. The last radar return at 0852:27 indicated an altitude of 2,600 feet msl, which was in the vicinity of the accident location. Postaccident analysis of position information recovered from an enhanced ground proximity warning system (EGPWS) showed that last 10 seconds of recorded data exhibits a steadily increasing negative vertical speed rate. The last two seconds of data recorded a 5,000 foot per minute descent up to a 15,000 foot per minute descent. The roll rate of the airplane in the last 10 seconds of recorded data varied from a 24 degree roll to the right to a 28 degree roll to the left. During the final moments of the recorded flight data, ground speed peaked around 140 knots, and then decreases to 20 knots in two seconds. Examination of the wreckage revealed no evidence of any pre-impact mechanical malfunctions or failures. Analyses of weather information and witness statements were consistent in depicting conditions likely to have produced restricted visibility at the time of the accident. Therefore, it is likely that the restricted visibility conditions and  the airplane’s turning ground track would have been conducive to the development of spatial disorientation. Subsequently, the rapid descent and steep bank angle could have resulted from the pilot losing control of the airplane due to spatial disorientation.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. VFR encounter with IMC during enroute (cruise) defining event
  2. Loss of visual reference during enroute (cruise)
  3. Loss of control in flight during enroute (cruise)
  4. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Psychological › Perception/orientation/illusio › Spatial disorientation › Pilot
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Low ceiling › Contributed to outcome

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 285 hours in all
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 422 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, August 13, 2011
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Cont Motor IO-360-ES (piston); 0 hours total
  • Fire on the ground

The flight

  • Departed from: NQA Millington TN at 1:25 pm
  • Destination: Pensacola FL
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: at 4 knots
  • Visibility: 6 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 900 ft; ovct at 900 ft
  • Temperature: 75°F (24°C), dew point 72°F (22°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.98 inHg
  • Observation at 1:35 pm from NQA, 38 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.