The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA10LA318 · Final report

Amateur-built Hudson Flyer accident near Penn Yan, New York, June 18, 2010

On June 18, 2010 at about 7:05 pm local time, a amateur-built Hudson Flyer, registered N910GC, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach (VFR pattern crosswind) near Penn Yan, New York (Penn Yan Airport). It was a flight test under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was seriously injured. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s failure to maintain altitude after takeoff.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
June 18, 2010 · about 7:05 pm local time
Place
Penn Yan, New York · Penn Yan Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was seriously injured.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Amateur-built Hudson Flyer
Registration
N910GC · no longer on the register · serial 1
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Flight test · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The accident flight was the fourth test flight of the airplane, which was a historical replica of an airplane built in 1910, and it was the first time that the pilot planned to perform a traffic pattern flight around the airport before returning to land. The pilot reported that the airplane's controls were responsive and effective during the first three flights, which had a total duration of about 5 minutes. While the first three flights had been conducted under calm wind conditions, there was a crosswind from the west at the time of the accident. A witness to the accident flight stated that the airplane took off on runway 19, climbed to about 100 feet above ground level, and turned left (downwind) about two-thirds of the way down the runway. The airplane entered a controlled descent and impacted the ground in a right-wing-low attitude. The pilot did not report any mechanical malfunctions or anomalies with the airplane. He stated that the airplane began to descend after beginning the left turn and that he thought that the airplane experienced a decrease in lift as a result of the tailwind. Although an airplane does not lose aerodynamic lift when turning from a crosswind to a tailwind, the pilot may have misperceived the increased ground speed as an increase in airspeed and increased the airplane’s pitch angle to compensate, resulting in a descent due to increased drag.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of lift during approach (VFR pattern crosswind) defining event
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during emergency descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › Tailwind › Response/compensation
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Altitude › Not attained/maintained

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, flight instructor, flight engineer
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 26,000 hours in all; 0 in this make and model; 20 in the last 90 days; 19,000 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: March 1, 2010
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: ctr
  • Injury: serious injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 0 hours
  • Last inspection: condition inspection, June 18, 2010; 0 hours since
  • Seats: 1
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Curtiss OX-5 (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: PEO Penn Yan NY at 7:00 pm
  • Destination: PEO Penn Yan NY
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 19, 5,500 ft by 100 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 230° at 8 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 79°F (26°C), dew point 55°F (13°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.09 inHg
  • Observation at 6:53 pm from PEO

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.