The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA09CA539 · Final report

Cessna 172 accident near Factoryville, Pennsylvania, September 27, 2009

On September 27, 2009 at about 5:30 pm local time, a Cessna 172, registered N5123E, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing (landing roll) near Factoryville, Pennsylvania (Seamans Field). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person had minor injuries; 1 other was unhurt. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The flight instructor's delayed decision to take control of the airplane and execute a missed approach. Contributing to the accident was the lack of communication between the certificated flight instructor and the pilot receiving instruction.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
September 27, 2009 · about 5:30 pm local time
Place
Factoryville, Pennsylvania · Seamans Field · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person had minor injuries; 1 other was unhurt.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 172 · all 172s on the register
Registration
N5123E · registry record · serial 71722
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The certificated flight instructor (CFI) and private pilot receiving instruction were conducting an instrument approach to a 2,500-foot long runway in instrument meteorological conditions (IMC). The pilot receiving instruction was at the controls. As the airplane reached the minimum descent altitude, the pilot initiated a circle-to-land on the opposite runway. The CFI then said, "no," took control of the airplane, and conducted a "steep" turn to land on the approach runway. The pilot stated that they "had too much airspeed and floated almost halfway down the runway." Upon touchdown, the pilot reported "hydroplaning" on the wet runway. The airplane departed the end of the runway, slid down a grassy hill, and came to rest in a ditch, resulting in substantial damage to the firewall. The CFI stated "there was some confusion" regarding who was at the controls during touchdown, and he "should have taken over sooner" than he did. The pilot and the CFI reported no mechanical malfunctions or failures. The nearest weather reporting station, located approximately 15 nautical miles north of the accident site, reported winds from 310 degrees at 3 knots and 10 miles visibility around the time of the accident. The report also indicated that rain had ended about 15 minutes prior to the accident.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Landing area overshoot during landing (landing roll)
  2. Runway excursion during landing (landing roll) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Delayed action › Instructor/check pilot
  • factor Personnel issues › Task performance › Communication (personnel) › Lack of communication › Flight crew

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 190 hours in all; 190 in this make and model; 25 in the last 90 days; 12 in the last 30 days; 138 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: October 15, 2007
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

Flight instructor

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 8,000 hours in all; 3,000 in this make and model; 200 in the last 90 days; 60 in the last 30 days; 7,800 as pilot in command; 6,500 on instruments
  • Last flight review: July 1, 2009
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: minor injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 8,287 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, July 20, 2009
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,300 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-320 (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: SEG Selinsgrove PA at 4:45 pm
  • Destination: 9N3 Factoryville PA
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • Runway 04, 2,500 ft by 50 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 310° at 3 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 1,800 ft
  • Temperature: 64°F (18°C), dew point 61°F (16°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.56 inHg
  • Observation at 5:54 pm from AVP, 15 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew11

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.