The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB DEN00LA033 · Final report

Cessna T210M accident near Cedar City, Utah, July 16, 1999

On July 16, 1999 at about 5:00 pm local time, a Cessna T210M, registered N6029N, was substantially damaged in an accident near Cedar City, Utah (Cedar City airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's failure to follow alternate landing gear extension procedures. Factors were the main landing gear failure to extend and a loss of electrical power.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
July 16, 1999 · about 5:00 pm local time
Place
Cedar City, Utah · Cedar City
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna T210M · all T210Ms on the register
Registration
N6029N · no longer on the register · serial 21062897
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

While in cruise flight, electrical power was lost due to an alternator failure. The pilot elected to conduct a precautionary landing at an airport short of his destination. When he lowered the landing gear, the nose gear extended and locked down and the main landing gear remained in the up position. The pilot attempted to lower the main landing gear by the alternate method but failed to follow the complete procedure and the mains remained in the up position. He landed the aircraft with the nose landing gear extended and the mains retracted. During the landing sequence, the aircraft incurred damage to horizontal stabilizers and elevators.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 1,163 hours in all; 760 in this make and model; 14 in the last 90 days; 8 in the last 30 days; 1,163 as pilot in command
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (valid medical--w/ waivers/lim.)
  • Seat: unk

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 4,357 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, July 16, 1999; 64 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 3,800 lb
  • Seats: 6
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Continental TSIO-520 (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: SLC Salt Lake City UT at 3:30 pm
  • Destination: SGU Saint George UT
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 20, 8,653 ft by 150 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 210° at 15 knots, gusting 20
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 73°F (23°C), dew point 48°F (9°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.00 inHg
  • Observation at 6:53 pm from CDC, 1 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Other NTSB records under N6029N the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

2005-11-16SEA06CA017 · accident near Salt Lake City, UT · substantial damage · no injuries

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.