The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB DCA25LA156 · Final report

Boeing 737-8 accident near San Diego, California, March 2, 2025

On March 2, 2025 at about 10:16 pm local time, a 2022 Boeing 737-8, registered N8776L, was involved in an accident during enroute (cruise) near San Diego, California. It was flown under scheduled airline rules (Part 121). 1 person was seriously injured; 175 others were unhurt. The weather was conditions the NTSB did not record.

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

An encounter with an area of moderate clear air turbulence associated with the jet stream during cruise.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
March 2, 2025 · about 10:16 pm local time
Place
San Diego, California · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was seriously injured; 175 others were unhurt.
Weather
conditions the NTSB did not record
Aircraft
Boeing 737-8, built 2022 · all 737-8s on the register
Registration
N8776L · registry record · serial 67761
Damage
Not recorded
Flight
Flight · scheduled airline rules (Part 121)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

During cruise at FL345, Southwest Airlines flight 1425 enroute to San Diego International Airport (SAN) encountered turbulence, causing hot coffee to spill into a flight attendant’s boot. The incident occurred during cabin service in the aft galley, resulting in second-degree burns. The flight crew stated that before departure, they reviewed the forecasted weather conditions using Weather Services International (WSI) and SkyPath electronic flight bag (EFB) applications. Based on this assessment, the captain conducted a preflight briefing with the flight attendants, during which he informed them that no turbulence was expected during the flight. During the flight, both the captain and the first officer monitored their WSI and SkyPath EFB applications for potential weather and turbulence. They also queried other aircraft operating along similar routes and altitudes. No significant weather concerns were identified, with only occasional light turbulence reported along portions of the route. The captain did advise the FAs to secure the cabin early for arrival into SAN due to the breezy conditions reported on the automatic terminal information service (ATIS) at the time. Part of the weather document issued to the flight crew consisted of the National Weather Service (NWS) High-Level Significant Weather Prognostic Chart valid for 18Z and 00Z. The charts depicted a jet stream moving north-to-south across the track in the vicinity of the ETEOC waypoint at FL350 at 120 to 150 knots, with the tropopause lowering to FL350 in the vicinity of the event.  The NWS chart depicted the potential for moderate-to-severe turbulence between FL300 and FL460 in the vicinity of the turbulence encounter.  The winds aloft charts also indicated a defined upper-level trough and a deformation zone in the vicinity of the turbulence location and showed strong horizontal wind shears in the vicinity east of the jetstream location.  The Southwest Airlines Enhanced Weather Information System (EWINS) provider, WSI graphics, had a current advisory over the location for light to occasional moderate turbulence between FL280 to FL380.  The flight crew’s weather document provided information which depicted the route crossing the jet stream which showed moderate to occasional severe clear air turbulence (CAT) over the route.  In addition, the company issued weather advisories that warned of occasional light to moderate turbulence over the area where the event took place.  The flight attendant assigned to the “B” position reported that while performing beverage service in the aft galley, the aircraft encountered turbulence. During this time, she was pouring hot coffee, which spilled into her boot. She immediately removed the boot and applied cold water to the affected area. The flight attendant reported the onset of blistering and described the pain as severe. Despite the injury, she continued working until the flight’s final leg to Denver. Following the flight, the injured flight attendant sought medical attention and was diagnosed with second-degree burns. Eddy dissipation rate (EDR) is a measure for the intensity of turbulence in the atmosphere. It ranges from 0 to 1, where 0 indicates no turbulence and 1 indicates extreme turbulence. According to the flight data downloaded from the IATA Turbulence Aware platform, a peak EDR of 0.254 was recorded at approximately 2215 UTC at flight level FL350. Given the Boeing 737’s classification as a medium weight category aircraft, the recorded EDR value is consistent with moderate turbulence intensity.   At the time of the turbulence, the aircraft encountered winds from 338° at 64 knots and an outside air temperature of -51°C, indicative of its position on the cold (polar) side of the jet stream core and near or above the tropopause. As the flight progressed eastward, the outside air temperature further decreased to -53°C.   The approach and landing were uneventful, and the flight crew did not receive any report of the injury during the flight.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Turbulence encounter during enroute (cruise) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Turbulence › Clear air turbulence › Awareness of condition
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Turbulence › Clear air turbulence › Effect on personnel

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 16,052 hours in all; 129 in the last 90 days; 24 in the last 30 days; 6,115 as pilot in command; 1,154 on instruments
  • Last flight review: June 28, 2024
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

Co-pilot

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 12,000 hours in all; 1,288 in this make and model; 150 in the last 90 days; 60 in the last 30 days; 7,500 as pilot in command; 3,500 on instruments
  • Last flight review: March 10, 2024
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

Cabin Crew

  • Seat: unk
  • Injury: serious injuries

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: continuous airworthiness programme, February 24, 2022
  • Maximum gross weight: 181,700 lb
  • Seats: 181
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: Cfm Intl LEAP-1B28 SER (turbofan); 7,837 hours total
  • Engine 2: Cfm Intl LEAP-1B28 SER (turbofan); 7,837 hours total
  • Operator: Southwest Airlines CO

The flight

  • Departed from: HNL Honolulu HI at 6:22 pm
  • Destination: SAN San Diego CA
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Sky: not recorded
  • Temperature: 0°F (-18°C), dew point 0°F (-18°C)

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Cabi13
Flight crew2
Passengers170

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The NTSB has not released the docket for this case yet. The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), is usually released when the investigation is nearly complete, and the list here is refreshed when it appears. Check at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.