The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB DCA14LA137 · Final report

Boeing 757 accident near San Diego, California, July 30, 2014

On July 30, 2014 at about 5:40 am local time, a 1992 Boeing 757, registered N553UA, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing (flare/touchdown) near San Diego, California (San Diego Intl airport). It was flown under scheduled airline rules (Part 121). No one was hurt; 174 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

the first officer's failure to maintain the correct airspeed and pitch attitude during landing that resulted in a tailstrike.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
July 30, 2014 · about 5:40 am local time
Place
San Diego, California · San Diego Intl · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 174 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Boeing 757 222, built 1992 · all 757s on the register
Registration
N553UA · no longer on the register · serial 25277
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Flight · scheduled airline rules (Part 121)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

On July 29, 2014, about 2240 pacific daylight time, United Airlines flight 345, a Boeing 757-222, N553UA, experienced a tailstrike while landing at the San Diego International Airport (SAN), San Diego, California. There were no injuries to the 174 persons onboard. The airplane sustained substantial damage. The flight was operating under 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 121 as a regularly scheduled passenger flight from George Bush Intercontinental Airport (IAH), Houston, Texas, to SAN. According to the operator, the first officer (FO) was the pilot flying and the captain was the pilot monitoring. The accident flight was the second flight of the day for both crew members. The climb, cruise, and descent portions of the flight were uneventful. The airplane was configured for a flaps 30 landing with the autopilot off for the visual approach to runway 27. The target airspeed for the landing was 130 knots, 5 knots above VREF. An airplane performance study was completed based on the FDR data from the flight. The study showed the wind was constant during the final descent to the runway with about a 4-knot headwind component. At about 50 feet radio altitude, the FO began to gradually pull back on the column until the elevators deflected 12 degrees airplane nose up at touchdown. Touchdown occurred with a sink rate near 0, a pitch attitude of about 6 degrees and an airspeed of 120 knots (5 knots below VREF). After touchdown, thrust was commanded to idle and the speedbrakes were deployed. The FO then began to gradually release column backpressure; however, pitch attitude continued to increase towards the gear-struts-compressed tail strike pitch attitude. The airplane's pitch attitude eventually exceeded the gear struts compressed tail strike attitude of 10.5 degrees. The FO commanded reverse thrust as the tail strike occurred and then increased to maximum reverse thrust after derotation had occurred. Published Flight Operations Technical Bulletins issued by the manufacturer in 1988 and 1990 instructed pilots to immediately lower the nose after touchdown (i.e. apply forward pressure) and warned pilots that bleeding off airspeed below VREF prior to touchdown will increase body attitude and thereby increase the likelihood of a tail strike. In this accident, touchdown occurred about 5 knots below VREF and the nose-up elevator remained for nearly 3.5 seconds, causing the aft fuselage to contact the runway. Inspection of the airplane revealed substantial abrasion damage to two aft, lower skin panels spanning an area about 4 feet long by 1.5 feet wide. In addition, the forward and aft lower chords on the aft pressure bulkhead (APB) were deformed and the lower APB web was buckled.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Tailstrike during landing (flare/touchdown) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Incorrect action performance › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 19,400 hours in all; 7,000 in this make and model; 16,000 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: April 15, 2014
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

Co-pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, flight engineer, private
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 6,000 hours in all; 258 in this make and model; 3,000 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: March 4, 2014
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 72,854 hours
  • Last inspection: continuous airworthiness programme, May 18, 2014
  • Maximum gross weight: 228,178 lb
  • Seats: 190
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: P & W PW2040 (turbofan); 0 hours total
  • Engine 2: P & W PW2040 (turbofan); 0 hours total
  • Operator: United Airlines

The flight

  • Departed from: IAH Houston TX at 2:48 am
  • Destination: SAN San Diego CA
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • Runway 27, 9,400 ft by 200 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: night
  • Wind: from 300° at 6 knots
  • Visibility: 9 statute miles
  • Sky: a few clouds
  • Temperature: 73°F (23°C), dew point 66°F (19°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.98 inHg
  • Observation at 5:51 am

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Cabi4
Flight crew2
Passengers168

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.