The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CHI08LA071 · Final report

Airbus Industrie A319-114 accident near Detroit, Michigan, January 9, 2008

On January 9, 2008 at about 12:49 pm local time, a Airbus Industrie A319-114, registered N349NB, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach near Detroit, Michigan (Detroit Metro airport). It was flown under scheduled airline rules (Part 121). No one was hurt; 73 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The separation of the engine cowling which resulted from maintenance personnel failing to follow maintenance procedures in that they did not latch the engine cowling following the maintenance inspection. A factor associated with the accident was their attention was divereted from the task when another mechanic asked for assistance.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
January 9, 2008 · about 12:49 pm local time
Place
Detroit, Michigan · Detroit Metro · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 73 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Airbus Industrie A319-114 · all A319-114s on the register
Registration
N349NB · registry record · serial 1815
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Flight · scheduled airline rules (Part 121)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The accident flight was the first one for the airplane after having maintenance performed on the number two (right) engine during the previous evening. The first officer reported the engine cowls were flush and he did not see any "hanging" cowl latches when he looked underneath the engine cowls during the preflight. The captain reported the preflight, taxi, and takeoff were normal. During climb out the lead flight attendant informed the pilots that a passenger reported that the number two engine cowling was flapping after takeoff. The captain then began to monitor the N1 vibration indications on the number two engine. He reported that the vibration was approximately double the indication from the number one engine, but the indicator was not flashing, nor had it turned amber. The captain reported that during cruise flight the number two engine vibration decreased and about 20 minutes after they leveled off, the airplane shuddered. He reported the remainder of the flight was normal until they were taxiing after landing and the lead flight attendant called the cockpit stating that "part of the right engine had come off." Half of the engine cowl departed the airplane when it was on a one mile final. The other half departed the airplane as it touched down. Another airplane subsequently contacted this part of the cowling when it landed after the accident airplane. Contract maintenance personnel reported they changed the N1 sensor on the number two engine. They reported they shut the fan cowling, but did not latch it as they still needed to perform an engine run and check for leaks. They performed the engine run and were in the cockpit when another mechanic asked for help on another airplane. The mechanics left the accident airplane to assist the other mechanic. Neither mechanic returned to the accident airplane to either latch or verify that the fan cowling had been latched. The aircraft maintenance manual (AMM) instructions for replacing the N1 sensor states, "Close the fan cowl doors (Ref. AMM TASK 71-13-00-410-040)." This task was not completed prior to the airplane being returned to service. The separated cowling contacted the right side of the horizontal stabilizer which resulted in substantial damage to the stabilizer. In addition, the fan cowl doors, number two engine pylon, the number two engine reverser, and the right wing number one slat were damaged.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Sys/Comp malf/fail (non-power) during approach defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • factor Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Attention › Maintenance personnel
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Power plant › Engine cowling system › Failure
  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Forgotten action/omission › Maintenance personnel

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, flight engineer
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 13,615 hours in all; 8,079 in this make and model; 281 in the last 90 days; 88 in the last 30 days; 6,797 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: July 1, 2006
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

Co-pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, commercial pilot, flight engineer
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 7,161 hours in all; 4,103 in this make and model; 232 in the last 90 days; 66 in the last 30 days
  • Last flight review: April 1, 2007
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rear
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 15,029 hours
  • Last inspection: continuous airworthiness programme, July 1, 2007; 317 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 155,200 lb
  • Seats: 132
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Cfm International CFM56-5-A5 (turbofan); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: LGA New York NY at 11:18 am
  • Destination: DTW Detroit MI
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • Runway 27R, 8,700 ft by 200 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 280° at 15 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 3,800 ft
  • Temperature: 39°F (4°C), dew point 30°F (-1°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.89 inHg
  • Observation at 12:53 pm from DTW, 1 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Cabi3
Flight crew2
Passengers68

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.